Literature DB >> 17242269

Renal mass core biopsy: accuracy and impact on clinical management.

Katherine E Maturen1, Hanh V Nghiem, Elaine M Caoili, Ellen G Higgins, J Stuart Wolf, David P Wood.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to determine the accuracy of imaging-guided percutaneous renal mass biopsy and its impact on clinical management.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: With institutional review board approval, we retrospectively reviewed imaging-guided renal biopsies performed by radiologists at our institution between February 1999 and July 2005. Patient records, pathology reports, and imaging studies were reviewed. Concordance of biopsy diagnosis and follow-up data was assessed. Significant impact on clinical management was determined in collaboration with two experienced urologists and was defined as a change from no therapy to therapy, including surgery, tumor ablation, chemotherapy, or radiation.
RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-six renal biopsies were performed during the study period. Of these, 123 were random biopsies and fine-needle technique was used for one; these 124 were excluded. One hundred fifty-two renal mass biopsies were performed using coaxial 18-gauge core needle technique in 125 patients (55 women, 70 men; average age, 60 years; range, 28-90 years). There were two (1.3%) postprocedural hematomas (one [0.7%] requiring blood transfusion) and one (0.7%) delayed renal pseudoaneurysm attributed to biopsy. No tumor seeding was identified. In 85 biopsies (56%), malignant neoplasm was found, 61 biopsies (40%) yielded benign findings, and six (4%) were nondiagnostic. The sensitivity for malignancy was 97.7%; specificity, 100%; positive predictive value, 100%; and negative predictive value, 100%. At least 92 (60.5%) biopsy results significantly impacted clinical management.
CONCLUSION: Imaging-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy of renal masses is safe and highly accurate. Tissue diagnosis alters clinical decision making in a majority of the cases and may allow a number of unnecessary nephrectomies to be avoided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17242269     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.06.0220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  38 in total

1.  CT fluoroscopy-guided renal tumour cutting needle biopsy: retrospective evaluation of diagnostic yield, safety, and risk factors for diagnostic failure.

Authors:  Toshihiro Iguchi; Takao Hiraki; Yusuke Matsui; Hiroyasu Fujiwara; Jun Sakurai; Yoshihisa Masaoka; Hideo Gobara; Susumu Kanazawa
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of imaging-guided needle biopsy of renal masses. Retrospective analysis on 150 cases.

Authors:  Andrea Veltri; Irene Garetto; Irene Tosetti; Marco Busso; Alessandro Volpe; Donatella Pacchioni; Enrico Bollito; Mauro Papotti
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  The role of percutaneous renal biopsy in the management of small renal masses.

Authors:  Rou Wang; Amy Y Li; David P Wood
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  The role of renal biopsy in small renal masses.

Authors:  Rodolfo Burruni; Benoit Lhermitte; Yannick Cerantola; Thomas Tawadros; Jean-Yves Meuwly; Dominik Berthold; Patrice Jichlinski; Massimo Valerio
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Microarray gene expression profiling using core biopsies of renal neoplasia.

Authors:  Craig G Rogers; Jonathon A Ditlev; Min-Han Tan; Jun Sugimura; Chao-Nan Qian; Jeff Cooper; Brian Lane; Michael A Jewett; Richard J Kahnoski; Eric J Kort; Bin T Teh
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 4.060

6.  Cellular mesoblastic nephroma (infantile renal fibrosarcoma): institutional review of the clinical, diagnostic imaging, and pathologic features of a distinctive neoplasm of infancy.

Authors:  Petek Bayindir; Robert Paul Guillerman; M John Hicks; M Murali Chintagumpala
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-07-21

Review 7.  Biopsy of renal masses: when and why.

Authors:  V Anik Sahni; Stuart G Silverman
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 3.909

8.  The current role of renal biopsy in the management of localized renal tumors.

Authors:  Gagan Gautam; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec

Review 9.  Imaging and management of the incidentally discovered renal mass.

Authors:  Jonathon Willatt; Isaac R Francis
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 3.909

10.  Watchful waiting in the treatment of the small renal mass.

Authors:  K Clint Cary; Chandru P Sundaram
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.