Literature DB >> 17240459

Tissue engineered cartilage "bioshell" protective layer for subcutaneous implants.

Angelo Monroy1, Koji Kojima, Marcielle A Ghanem, Ana Cristina Paz, Syed Kamil, Charles A Vacanti, Roland D Eavey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: One current technique to reconstruct an ear for microtia involves the use of a high density polyethylene auricular implant; however, the implant can extrude if not covered in a temporoparietal fascia flap. Theoretically, an autologous tissue engineered cartilage "bioshell" protective coating around a permanent biocompatible implant might reduce potential extrusion to avoid the flap requirement. We hypothesized that if subjected to intentional exposure, a bioshell coating over an implant would provide enhanced wound healing.
METHODS: Six sheets of high density polyethylene and six sheets of 24 carat pure gold wire-mesh measuring 19 mm x 25 mm were implanted subcutaneously in an immunocompetent swine model. Half of each implant group were coated with chondrocytes (50-70 million cells/cm(3)) which were suspended in Pluronic F-127 30% hydrogel; the remaining implants without chondrocytes were used as controls. At 10 weeks post-implantation, partial implant exposure via excision of overlying skin was performed to simulate extrusion and the sites were allowed to heal secondarily.
RESULTS: All (6/6) of bioshell implants achieved wound closure after exposure by the seventh post-operative day; controls achieved closure at approximately 10 days. Bioshell neocartilage was evaluated and confirmed histologically using hematoxylin and eosin and safranin O stains. Histochemically, neocartilage approximated native cartilage with 60% glycosaminoglycans content.
CONCLUSION: A 'proof-of-principle' tissue engineered bioshell around subcutaneous high density polyethylene and gold implants generated an elastic neocartilage coating, elicited a low inflammatory reaction, and was associated with 30% faster wound healing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17240459     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2006.11.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  4 in total

1.  [Tissue engineering using porous polyethylene implants].

Authors:  S Strieth
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Comparison of Different In Vivo Incubation Sites to Produce Tissue-Engineered Small Intestine.

Authors:  Yanchun Liu; Barrett P Cromeens; Yijie Wang; Kelli Fisher; Jed Johnson; Jason Chakroff; Gail E Besner
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Components of the plasminogen activation system promote engraftment of porous polyethylene biomaterial via common and distinct effects.

Authors:  Christoph A Reichel; Maximilian E T Hessenauer; Kerstin Pflieger; Markus Rehberg; Sandip M Kanse; Stefan Zahler; Fritz Krombach; Alexander Berghaus; Sebastian Strieth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Comparison of the mechanical properties of different skin sites for auricular and nasal reconstruction.

Authors:  M F Griffin; B C Leung; Y Premakumar; M Szarko; P E Butler
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-04-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.