Literature DB >> 17240173

Memory influences on hippocampal and striatal neural codes: effects of a shift between task rules.

Oxana Eschenko1, Sheri J Y Mizumori.   

Abstract

Interactions with neocortical memory systems may facilitate flexible information processing by hippocampus. We sought direct evidence for such memory influences by recording hippocampal neural responses to a change in cognitive strategy. Well-trained rats switched (within a single recording session) between the use of place and response strategies to solve a plus maze task. Maze and extramaze environments were constant throughout testing. Place fields demonstrated (in-field) firing rate and location-based reorganization [Leutgeb, S., Leutgeb, J. K., Barnes, C. A., Moser, E. I., McNaughton, B. L., & Moser, M. B. (2005). Independent codes for spatial and episodic memory in hippocampal neuronal ensembles. Science, 309, 619-623] after a task switch, suggesting that hippocampus encoded each phase of testing as a different context, or episode. The task switch also resulted in qualitative and quantitative changes to discharge that were correlated with an animal's velocity or acceleration of movement. Thus, the effects of a strategy switch extended beyond the spatial domain, and the movement correlates were not passive reflections of the current behavioral state. To determine whether hippocampal neural responses were unique, striatal place and movement-correlated neurons were simultaneously recorded with hippocampal neurons. Striatal place and movement cells exhibited a response profile that was similar, but not identical, to that observed for hippocampus after a strategy switch. Thus, retrieval of a different memory led both neural systems to represent a different context. However, hippocampus may play a special (though not exclusive) role in flexible spatial processing since correlated firing amongst cell pairs was highest when rats successfully switched between two spatial tasks. Correlated firing by striatal cell pairs increased following any strategy switch, supporting the view that striatum codes change in reinforcement contingencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17240173      PMCID: PMC1940837          DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2006.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem        ISSN: 1074-7427            Impact factor:   2.877


  56 in total

1.  Building neural representations of habits.

Authors:  M S Jog; Y Kubota; C I Connolly; V Hillegaart; A M Graybiel
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-11-26       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Hippocampus as comparator: role of the two input and two output systems of the hippocampus in selection and registration of information.

Authors:  O S Vinogradova
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.899

3.  The effects of dopamine D(1) receptor blockade in the prelimbic-infralimbic areas on behavioral flexibility.

Authors:  Michael E Ragozzino
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  Role of the dorsomedial striatum in behavioral flexibility for response and visual cue discrimination learning.

Authors:  Michael E Ragozzino; Katharine E Ragozzino; Sheri J Y Mizumori; Raymond P Kesner
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.912

5.  Temporary inactivation of the retrosplenial cortex causes a transient reorganization of spatial coding in the hippocampus.

Authors:  B G Cooper; S J Mizumori
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  A neural correlate of response bias in monkey caudate nucleus.

Authors:  Johan Lauwereyns; Katsumi Watanabe; Brian Coe; Okihide Hikosaka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-07-25       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Memory for spatial locations, motor responses, and objects: triple dissociation among the hippocampus, caudate nucleus, and extrastriate visual cortex.

Authors:  R P Kesner; B L Bolland; M Dakis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Relationships between place cell firing fields and navigational decisions by rats.

Authors:  Pierre-Pascal Lenck-Santini; Robert U Muller; Etienne Save; Bruno Poucet
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Involvement of the dorsomedial striatum in behavioral flexibility: role of muscarinic cholinergic receptors.

Authors:  Michael E Ragozzino; Jane Jih; Arianna Tzavos
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2002-10-25       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Evidence for a relationship between place-cell spatial firing and spatial memory performance.

Authors:  P P Lenck-Santini; E Save; B Poucet
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.899

View more
  21 in total

1.  The shift from a response strategy to object-in-place strategy during learning is accompanied by a matching shift in neural firing correlates in the hippocampus.

Authors:  Inah Lee; Jangjin Kim
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Striatal versus hippocampal representations during win-stay maze performance.

Authors:  Joshua D Berke; Jason T Breck; Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Lesions of the hippocampus or dorsolateral striatum disrupt distinct aspects of spatial navigation strategies based on proximal and distal information in a cued variant of the Morris water task.

Authors:  James P Rice; Douglas G Wallace; Derek A Hamilton
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Stable encoding of task structure coexists with flexible coding of task events in sensorimotor striatum.

Authors:  Yasuo Kubota; Jun Liu; Dan Hu; William E DeCoteau; Uri T Eden; Anne C Smith; Ann M Graybiel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Advance cueing produces enhanced action-boundary patterns of spike activity in the sensorimotor striatum.

Authors:  Terra D Barnes; Jian-Bin Mao; Dan Hu; Yasuo Kubota; Anna A Dreyer; Catherine Stamoulis; Emery N Brown; Ann M Graybiel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Distance and direction, but not light cues, support response reversal learning.

Authors:  S L Wright; G M Martin; C M Thorpe; K Haley; D M Skinner
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 7.  The form and function of hippocampal context representations.

Authors:  David M Smith; David A Bulkin
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Double dissociation and hierarchical organization of strategy switches and reversals in the rat PFC.

Authors:  James J Young; Matthew L Shapiro
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Placing memories in context: Hippocampal representations promote retrieval of appropriate memories.

Authors:  David A Bulkin; L Matthew Law; David M Smith
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.899

Review 10.  Still searching for the engram.

Authors:  Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.