Literature DB >> 17238387

Health information text characteristics.

Gondy Leroy1, Evren Eryilmaz, Benjamin T Laroya.   

Abstract

Millions of people search online for medical text, but these texts are often too complicated to understand. Readability evaluations are mostly based on surface metrics such as character or words counts and sentence syntax, but content is ignored. We compared four types of documents, easy and difficult WebMD documents, patient blogs, and patient educational material, for surface and content-based metrics. The documents differed significantly in reading grade levels and vocabulary used. WebMD pages with high readability also used terminology that was more consumer-friendly. Moreover, difficult documents are harder to understand due to their grammar and word choice and because they discuss more difficult topics. This indicates that we can simplify many documents by focusing on word choice in addition to sentence structure, however, for difficult documents this may be insufficient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17238387      PMCID: PMC1839344     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  8 in total

1.  Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish.

Authors:  G K Berland; M N Elliott; L S Morales; J I Algazy; R L Kravitz; M S Broder; D E Kanouse; J A Muñoz; J A Puyol; M Lara; K E Watkins; H Yang; E A McGlynn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001 May 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Easy-to-read consumer communications: a missing link in Medicaid managed care.

Authors:  J Root; S Stableford
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.265

3.  Helping healthcare consumers understand: an "interpretive layer" for finding and making sense of medical information.

Authors:  Dagobert Soergel; Tony Tse; Laura Slaughter
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2004

4.  Identifying consumer-friendly display (CFD) names for health concepts.

Authors:  Qing T Zeng; Tony Tse; Jon Crowell; Guy Divita; Laura Roth; Allen C Browne
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

5.  The readability of pediatric patient education materials on the World Wide Web.

Authors:  D M D'Alessandro; P Kingsley; J Johnson-West
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2001-07

6.  The readability of American Academy of Pediatrics patient education brochures.

Authors:  Margaret Comerford Freda
Journal:  J Pediatr Health Care       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.812

7.  Health literacy: report of the Council on Scientific Affairs. Ad Hoc Committee on Health Literacy for the Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-02-10       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey.

Authors:  Laurence Baker; Todd H Wagner; Sara Singer; M Kate Bundorf
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Voice-dictated versus typed-in clinician notes: linguistic properties and the potential implications on natural language processing.

Authors:  Kai Zheng; Qiaozhu Mei; Lei Yang; Frank J Manion; Ulysses J Balis; David A Hanauer
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

2.  Paraphrase acquisition from comparable medical corpora of specialized and lay texts.

Authors:  Louise Deléger; Pierre Zweigenbaum
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2008-11-06

3.  Developing informatics tools and strategies for consumer-centered health communication.

Authors:  Alla Keselman; Robert Logan; Catherine Arnott Smith; Gondy Leroy; Qing Zeng-Treitler
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 4.497

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.