Fredrik Asztely1, Gerd Ekstedt, Bertil Rydenhag, Kristina Malmgren. 1. Epilepsy Research Group, Section of Clinical Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, SE 413 45 Göteborg, Sweden. Fredrik.asztely@neuro.gu.se
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare long term (10 years) seizure outcome, psychosocial outcome and use of antiepileptic drugs (AED) with the 2 year follow-up in adults after resective epilepsy surgery. METHODS: All adults (n = 70) who underwent resective epilepsy surgery from 1987 to 1995 in the Göteborg Epilepsy Surgery Series were included. Fifty-four had undergone temporal lobe resections and 16 extratemporal resections (12 frontal). A cross-sectional follow-up in the form of a semistructured interview was performed in late 2003. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 12.4 years (range 8.6-16.2). Of the 70 patients (51% males), five (7%) were dead (three as a result of non-epilepsy related causes). Of the 65 patients interviewed, 38 (58%) were seizure-free at the long term follow-up: 65% of the patients with temporal lobe resections and 36% of the patients with extratemporal resections. Of the 35 patients who were seizure-free at the 2 year follow-up, 3 (9%) had seizures at the long term follow-up. Of the 30 patients who had seizures at the 2 year follow-up, 6 (20%) were seizure-free at the long term follow-up. Of all 65 patients, 45 (69%) had the same seizure status as the 2 year follow-up. Sixteen (25%) had an improved seizure status and 4 (6%) had a worsened status. Of the seizure-free patients, 11 (29%) had ceased taking AED, 28 (74%) were working and 25 (66%) had a driving license. CONCLUSIONS: Adult patients who are seizure-free 2 years after resective epilepsy surgery are most likely to still be seizure-free 10 years later. Most are working and have obtained a driving license.
OBJECTIVE: To compare long term (10 years) seizure outcome, psychosocial outcome and use of antiepileptic drugs (AED) with the 2 year follow-up in adults after resective epilepsy surgery. METHODS: All adults (n = 70) who underwent resective epilepsy surgery from 1987 to 1995 in the Göteborg Epilepsy Surgery Series were included. Fifty-four had undergone temporal lobe resections and 16 extratemporal resections (12 frontal). A cross-sectional follow-up in the form of a semistructured interview was performed in late 2003. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 12.4 years (range 8.6-16.2). Of the 70 patients (51% males), five (7%) were dead (three as a result of non-epilepsy related causes). Of the 65 patients interviewed, 38 (58%) were seizure-free at the long term follow-up: 65% of the patients with temporal lobe resections and 36% of the patients with extratemporal resections. Of the 35 patients who were seizure-free at the 2 year follow-up, 3 (9%) had seizures at the long term follow-up. Of the 30 patients who had seizures at the 2 year follow-up, 6 (20%) were seizure-free at the long term follow-up. Of all 65 patients, 45 (69%) had the same seizure status as the 2 year follow-up. Sixteen (25%) had an improved seizure status and 4 (6%) had a worsened status. Of the seizure-free patients, 11 (29%) had ceased taking AED, 28 (74%) were working and 25 (66%) had a driving license. CONCLUSIONS: Adult patients who are seizure-free 2 years after resective epilepsy surgery are most likely to still be seizure-free 10 years later. Most are working and have obtained a driving license.
Authors: N Foldvary; B Nashold; E Mascha; E A Thompson; N Lee; J O McNamara; D V Lewis; J S Luther; A H Friedman; R A Radtke Journal: Neurology Date: 2000-02-08 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Lilia Maria Morales Chacón; Ivan Garcia Maeso; Margarita M Baez Martin; Juan E Bender Del Busto; María Eugenia García Navarro; Nelson Quintanal Cordero; Bárbara Estupiñan Díaz; Lourdes Lorigados Pedre; Ricardo Valdés Yerena; Judith Gonzalez; Randy Garbey Fernandez; Abel Sánchez Coroneux Journal: Behav Sci (Basel) Date: 2018-02-01
Authors: Midhun Mohan; Simon Keller; Andrew Nicolson; Shubhabrata Biswas; David Smith; Jibril Osman Farah; Paul Eldridge; Udo Wieshmann Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-05-16 Impact factor: 3.240