Literature DB >> 17234675

Lidocaine-prilocaine (EMLA) cream as analgesia for hysterosalpingography: a prospective, randomized, controlled, double blinded study.

G Liberty1, M Gal, T Halevy-Shalem, R Michaelson-Cohen, N Galoyan, J Hyman, T Eldar-Geva, E Vatashsky, E Margalioth.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study is to evaluate the efficacy of applying lidocaine 25 mg-prilocaine-25 mg/G cream (EMLA 5%) on the uterine cervix for pain relief when performing hysterosalpingography (HSG).
METHODS: Eighty-two patients undergoing HSG as part of infertility evaluation were randomized into groups receiving EMLA (42) or placebo cream (40) in a double-blinded prospective study from which four women were later excluded. The cream was applied to the uterine cervix by means of a cervical cup 30 min before the HSG. Pain perception related to the HSG procedure was scored by visual analogue scale (VAS) at five predefined steps: after speculum application, after cervical instrumentation of the tenaculum and cannula, at the end of uterine filling, at completion of tubal spillage, and immediately following instrument removal. In addition, the patients were asked to retrospectively rate the pain during the entire procedure in a telephone interview the following day.
RESULTS: Cervical instrumentation was found to be the most painful step of HSG (P < 0.001). When comparing the VAS pain scores, cervical instrumentation in the EMLA-treated patients was associated with significantly less pain than the control group: 3.3 +/- 2.9 versus 4.9 +/- 2.7, respectively (P = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Topical application of EMLA 5% cream on the uterine cervix before performing HSG significantly reduced the pain during this procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17234675     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/del517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  7 in total

1.  Randomized controlled trial of benzocaine versus placebo spray for pain relief at hysterosalpingogram.

Authors:  E A Bachman; S Senapati; M D Sammel; S K Kalra
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 3.828

2.  Comparison of four different pain relief methods during hysterosalpingography: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Bekir Serdar Unlu; Mehmet Yilmazer; Gulengul Koken; Dagistan Tolga Arioz; Ebru Unlu; Elif Dogan Baki; Cemile Kurttay; Osman Karacin
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.037

3.  Randomized double-blind clinical trial of eutectic mixture of local anesthetic creams in reducing pain during hysterosalpingography.

Authors:  Mojgan Kalantari; Shahrzad Zadeh Modares; Firoozeh Ahmadi; Vajihe Hazari; Hadieh Haghighi; Mohammad Chehrazi; Melika Razaghi
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 0.212

4.  Lidocaine-Prilocaine Cream as Analgesia for IUD Insertion: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Triple Blinded Study.

Authors:  Samira Tavakolian; Mahbobeh Ahmadi Doulabi; Alireza Akbarzade Baghban; Alireza Mortazavi; Maryam Ghorbani
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2015-01-27

5.  Comparison of the Effects of Lidocaine Prilocaine Cream (EMLA) and Lidocaine Injection on Reduction of Perineal Pain During Perineum Repair in Normal Vaginal Delivery.

Authors:  Roxana Kargar; Afsaneh Aghazadeh-Nainie; Hamid Reza Khoddami-Vishteh
Journal:  J Family Reprod Health       Date:  2016-03

6.  Effectiveness of paracervical block for pain relief in women undergoing hysterosalpingography.

Authors:  Shikha Jain; Dattaprasad B Inamdar; Abha Majumdar; Deepak K Jain
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

Review 7.  Effectiveness of interventions for pain relief in hysterosalpingographyAnetwork meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Xin Guo; Zongjian Tan
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.088

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.