Literature DB >> 17234021

Cost-effectiveness of surveillance programs for families at high and moderate risk of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer.

Kim R Olsen1, Stig E Bojesen, Anne-Marie M Gerdes, Karen Lindorff-Larsen, Inge T Bernstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Surveillance programs are recommended to both families at high risk (Amsterdam-positive families with known- and unknown mutation) and moderate risk (families not fulfilling all Amsterdam criteria) of colorectal cancer (CRC). Cost-effectiveness has so far only been estimated for the group at high risk. The aim of the present study is to determine cost-effectiveness of surveillance programs where families at both high and moderate risk of HNPCC participate.
METHODS: A decision analytic model (Markov model) is developed to assess surveillance programs where families at high and moderate risk of HNPCC are offered surveillance from age 25 and age 45, respectively. The model includes costs for all families referred to genetic counseling, including genetic risk assessment, mutation analysis, and surveillance in relevant families with or without known mutation, plus the costs related to any surgical treatment. The risk of metachronous CRC is also modeled.
RESULTS: Incremental costs per life year gained are estimated to be euro 980 when families at both high and moderate risk of HNPCC undergo surveillance (euro 508 for high risk and euro 1600 for moderate risk) and euro 1947 when the moderate risk group is evaluated genetically but not offered surveillance. Sensitivity analysis showed these findings to be robust, although cost-effectiveness can be improved in cases of more conservative referrals to genetic counseling.
CONCLUSIONS: The result for high risk families confirms the findings in similar studies. Somewhat surprisingly, cost-effectiveness improves when surveillance of the moderate risk groups are included in the decision model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17234021     DOI: 10.1017/S0266462307051616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  11 in total

Review 1.  Challenges to the translation of genomic information into clinical practice and health policy: Utilization, preferences and economic value.

Authors:  Kathryn A Phillips; Su-Ying Liang; Stephanie Van Bebber
Journal:  Curr Opin Mol Ther       Date:  2008-06

2.  Cost-effectiveness of early cancer surveillance for patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome.

Authors:  Casey R Tak; Eman Biltaji; Wendy Kohlmann; Luke Maese; Pierre Hainaut; Anita Villani; David Malkin; Catherine M T Sherwin; Diana I Brixner; Joshua D Schiffman
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.167

3.  Predictive genetic testing of first degree relatives of mutation carriers is a cost-effective strategy in preventing hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer in Singapore.

Authors:  Vivian Wei Wang; Poh Koon Koh; Wai Leng Chow; Jeremy Fung Yen Lim
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 4.  EGAPP supplementary evidence review: DNA testing strategies aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality from Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Glenn E Palomaki; Monica R McClain; Stephanie Melillo; Heather L Hampel; Stephen N Thibodeau
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 8.822

5.  Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: genetic testing strategies in newly diagnosed individuals with colorectal cancer aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality from Lynch syndrome in relatives.

Authors: 
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 6.  Economic evidence on identifying clinically actionable findings with whole-genome sequencing: a scoping review.

Authors:  Michael P Douglas; Uri Ladabaum; Mark J Pletcher; Deborah A Marshall; Kathryn A Phillips
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 7.  Screening for colorectal cancer: possible improvements by risk assessment evaluation?

Authors:  Hans J Nielsen; Karen V Jakobsen; Ib J Christensen; Nils Brünner
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  Colorectal cancer incidence in path_MLH1 carriers subjected to different follow-up protocols: a Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database report.

Authors:  Toni Seppälä; Kirsi Pylvänäinen; Dafydd Gareth Evans; Heikki Järvinen; Laura Renkonen-Sinisalo; Inge Bernstein; Elke Holinski-Feder; Paola Sala; Annika Lindblom; Finlay Macrae; Ignacio Blanco; Rolf Sijmons; Jacqueline Jeffries; Hans Vasen; John Burn; Sigve Nakken; Eivind Hovig; Einar Andreas Rødland; Kukatharmini Tharmaratnam; Wouter H de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel; James Hill; Juul Wijnen; Mark Jenkins; Maurizio Genuardi; Kate Green; Fiona Lalloo; Lone Sunde; Miriam Mints; Lucio Bertario; Marta Pineda; Matilde Navarro; Monika Morak; Ian M Frayling; John-Paul Plazzer; Julian R Sampson; Gabriel Capella; Gabriela Möslein; Jukka-Pekka Mecklin; Pål Møller
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 2.857

9.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of alternative colorectal cancer screening strategies in high-risk individuals.

Authors:  Robert Benamouzig; Stéphanie Barré; Jean-Christophe Saurin; Henri Leleu; Alexandre Vimont; Sabrine Taleb; Frédéric De Bels
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 4.409

10.  Lack of association between screening interval and cancer stage in Lynch syndrome may be accounted for by over-diagnosis; a prospective Lynch syndrome database report.

Authors:  Toni T Seppälä; Aysel Ahadova; Mev Dominguez-Valentin; Finlay Macrae; D Gareth Evans; Christina Therkildsen; Julian Sampson; Rodney Scott; John Burn; Gabriela Möslein; Inge Bernstein; Elke Holinski-Feder; Kirsi Pylvänäinen; Laura Renkonen-Sinisalo; Anna Lepistö; Charlotte Kvist Lautrup; Annika Lindblom; John-Paul Plazzer; Ingrid Winship; Douglas Tjandra; Lior H Katz; Stefan Aretz; Robert Hüneburg; Stefanie Holzapfel; Karl Heinimann; Adriana Della Valle; Florencia Neffa; Nathan Gluck; Wouter H de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel; Hans Vasen; Monika Morak; Verena Steinke-Lange; Christoph Engel; Nils Rahner; Wolff Schmiegel; Deepak Vangala; Huw Thomas; Kate Green; Fiona Lalloo; Emma J Crosbie; James Hill; Gabriel Capella; Marta Pineda; Matilde Navarro; Ignacio Blanco; Sanne Ten Broeke; Maartje Nielsen; Ken Ljungmann; Sigve Nakken; Noralane Lindor; Ian Frayling; Eivind Hovig; Lone Sunde; Matthias Kloor; Jukka-Pekka Mecklin; Mette Kalager; Pål Møller
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 2.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.