OBJECTIVES: Surveillance programs are recommended to both families at high risk (Amsterdam-positive families with known- and unknown mutation) and moderate risk (families not fulfilling all Amsterdam criteria) of colorectal cancer (CRC). Cost-effectiveness has so far only been estimated for the group at high risk. The aim of the present study is to determine cost-effectiveness of surveillance programs where families at both high and moderate risk of HNPCC participate. METHODS: A decision analytic model (Markov model) is developed to assess surveillance programs where families at high and moderate risk of HNPCC are offered surveillance from age 25 and age 45, respectively. The model includes costs for all families referred to genetic counseling, including genetic risk assessment, mutation analysis, and surveillance in relevant families with or without known mutation, plus the costs related to any surgical treatment. The risk of metachronous CRC is also modeled. RESULTS: Incremental costs per life year gained are estimated to be euro 980 when families at both high and moderate risk of HNPCC undergo surveillance (euro 508 for high risk and euro 1600 for moderate risk) and euro 1947 when the moderate risk group is evaluated genetically but not offered surveillance. Sensitivity analysis showed these findings to be robust, although cost-effectiveness can be improved in cases of more conservative referrals to genetic counseling. CONCLUSIONS: The result for high risk families confirms the findings in similar studies. Somewhat surprisingly, cost-effectiveness improves when surveillance of the moderate risk groups are included in the decision model.
OBJECTIVES: Surveillance programs are recommended to both families at high risk (Amsterdam-positive families with known- and unknown mutation) and moderate risk (families not fulfilling all Amsterdam criteria) of colorectal cancer (CRC). Cost-effectiveness has so far only been estimated for the group at high risk. The aim of the present study is to determine cost-effectiveness of surveillance programs where families at both high and moderate risk of HNPCC participate. METHODS: A decision analytic model (Markov model) is developed to assess surveillance programs where families at high and moderate risk of HNPCC are offered surveillance from age 25 and age 45, respectively. The model includes costs for all families referred to genetic counseling, including genetic risk assessment, mutation analysis, and surveillance in relevant families with or without known mutation, plus the costs related to any surgical treatment. The risk of metachronous CRC is also modeled. RESULTS: Incremental costs per life year gained are estimated to be euro 980 when families at both high and moderate risk of HNPCC undergo surveillance (euro 508 for high risk and euro 1600 for moderate risk) and euro 1947 when the moderate risk group is evaluated genetically but not offered surveillance. Sensitivity analysis showed these findings to be robust, although cost-effectiveness can be improved in cases of more conservative referrals to genetic counseling. CONCLUSIONS: The result for high risk families confirms the findings in similar studies. Somewhat surprisingly, cost-effectiveness improves when surveillance of the moderate risk groups are included in the decision model.
Authors: Casey R Tak; Eman Biltaji; Wendy Kohlmann; Luke Maese; Pierre Hainaut; Anita Villani; David Malkin; Catherine M T Sherwin; Diana I Brixner; Joshua D Schiffman Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2019-02-04 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Glenn E Palomaki; Monica R McClain; Stephanie Melillo; Heather L Hampel; Stephen N Thibodeau Journal: Genet Med Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Michael P Douglas; Uri Ladabaum; Mark J Pletcher; Deborah A Marshall; Kathryn A Phillips Journal: Genet Med Date: 2015-05-21 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Toni Seppälä; Kirsi Pylvänäinen; Dafydd Gareth Evans; Heikki Järvinen; Laura Renkonen-Sinisalo; Inge Bernstein; Elke Holinski-Feder; Paola Sala; Annika Lindblom; Finlay Macrae; Ignacio Blanco; Rolf Sijmons; Jacqueline Jeffries; Hans Vasen; John Burn; Sigve Nakken; Eivind Hovig; Einar Andreas Rødland; Kukatharmini Tharmaratnam; Wouter H de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel; James Hill; Juul Wijnen; Mark Jenkins; Maurizio Genuardi; Kate Green; Fiona Lalloo; Lone Sunde; Miriam Mints; Lucio Bertario; Marta Pineda; Matilde Navarro; Monika Morak; Ian M Frayling; John-Paul Plazzer; Julian R Sampson; Gabriel Capella; Gabriela Möslein; Jukka-Pekka Mecklin; Pål Møller Journal: Hered Cancer Clin Pract Date: 2017-10-10 Impact factor: 2.857
Authors: Toni T Seppälä; Aysel Ahadova; Mev Dominguez-Valentin; Finlay Macrae; D Gareth Evans; Christina Therkildsen; Julian Sampson; Rodney Scott; John Burn; Gabriela Möslein; Inge Bernstein; Elke Holinski-Feder; Kirsi Pylvänäinen; Laura Renkonen-Sinisalo; Anna Lepistö; Charlotte Kvist Lautrup; Annika Lindblom; John-Paul Plazzer; Ingrid Winship; Douglas Tjandra; Lior H Katz; Stefan Aretz; Robert Hüneburg; Stefanie Holzapfel; Karl Heinimann; Adriana Della Valle; Florencia Neffa; Nathan Gluck; Wouter H de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel; Hans Vasen; Monika Morak; Verena Steinke-Lange; Christoph Engel; Nils Rahner; Wolff Schmiegel; Deepak Vangala; Huw Thomas; Kate Green; Fiona Lalloo; Emma J Crosbie; James Hill; Gabriel Capella; Marta Pineda; Matilde Navarro; Ignacio Blanco; Sanne Ten Broeke; Maartje Nielsen; Ken Ljungmann; Sigve Nakken; Noralane Lindor; Ian Frayling; Eivind Hovig; Lone Sunde; Matthias Kloor; Jukka-Pekka Mecklin; Mette Kalager; Pål Møller Journal: Hered Cancer Clin Pract Date: 2019-02-28 Impact factor: 2.857