Literature DB >> 17233639

Estimating wall guidance and attraction in mouse free locomotor behavior.

G Horev1, Y Benjamini, A Sakov, I Golani.   

Abstract

In this study, we estimate the influence exerted by the wall of the Open Field on the trajectory of the mouse. The wall exerts two types of influence on the mouse's path: one of guidance and one of attraction. The guiding influence is expressed by the tendency of mice to progress in parallel to the wall. This tendency wanes with increasing distance from the wall but is observed at large distances from it. The more parallel the mouse is to the wall the higher is its speed, even when distant from the wall. This association between heading direction and speed shows that the mouse controls its heading in reference to the wall. It is also observed in some blind strains, revealing that wall-guidance is not based exclusively on vision. The attraction influence is reflected by movement along the wall and by the asymmetry between speed during movement toward, and during movement away from the wall: sighted mice move faster toward the wall, whereas blind mice use similar speeds in both directions. Measures characterizing these influences are presented for five inbred strains, revealing heritable components that are replicable across laboratories. The revealed structure can lead to the identification of distinct groups of genes that mediate the distinct influences of guidance and attraction exerted by the wall. It can also serve as a framework for the decoding of electrophysiological data recorded in free moving rodents in the Open Field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17233639     DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2006.00216.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Brain Behav        ISSN: 1601-183X            Impact factor:   3.449


  10 in total

1.  Electrophysiological Signatures of Spatial Boundaries in the Human Subiculum.

Authors:  Sang Ah Lee; Jonathan F Miller; Andrew J Watrous; Michael R Sperling; Ashwini Sharan; Gregory A Worrell; Brent M Berry; Joshua P Aronson; Kathryn A Davis; Robert E Gross; Bradley Lega; Sameer Sheth; Sandhitsu R Das; Joel M Stein; Richard Gorniak; Daniel S Rizzuto; Joshua Jacobs
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Dosage-dependent phenotypes in models of 16p11.2 lesions found in autism.

Authors:  Guy Horev; Jacob Ellegood; Jason P Lerch; Young-Eun E Son; Lakshmi Muthuswamy; Hannes Vogel; Abba M Krieger; Andreas Buja; R Mark Henkelman; Michael Wigler; Alea A Mills
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Quantifying the buildup in extent and complexity of free exploration in mice.

Authors:  Yoav Benjamini; Ehud Fonio; Tal Galili; Gregor Z Havkin; Ilan Golani
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Drug discovery in psychiatric illness: mining for gold.

Authors:  Greg I Elmer; Neri Kafkafi
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 9.306

5.  Wall following in Xenopus laevis is barrier-driven.

Authors:  Sara Hänzi; Hans Straka
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Freedom of movement and the stability of its unfolding in free exploration of mice.

Authors:  Ehud Fonio; Yoav Benjamini; Ilan Golani
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Network analysis of rat spatial cognition: behaviorally-established symmetry in a physically asymmetrical environment.

Authors:  Shahaf Weiss; Osnat Yaski; David Eilam; Juval Portugali; Efrat Blumenfeld-Lieberthal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Transformation of the head-direction signal into a spatial code.

Authors:  Adrien Peyrache; Natalie Schieferstein; Gyorgy Buzsáki
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Mouse cognition-related behavior in the open-field: emergence of places of attraction.

Authors:  Anna Dvorkin; Yoav Benjamini; Ilan Golani
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  The angular interval between the direction of progression and body orientation in normal, alcohol- and cocaine treated fruit flies.

Authors:  Anna Gakamsky; Efrat Oron; Dan Valente; Partha P Mitra; Daniel Segal; Yoav Benjamini; Ilan Golani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.