Literature DB >> 29119247

Wall following in Xenopus laevis is barrier-driven.

Sara Hänzi1,2, Hans Straka3.   

Abstract

The tendency of animals to follow boundaries within their environment can serve as a strategy for spatial learning or defensive behaviour. We examined whether Xenopus laevis tadpoles and froglets employ such a strategy by characterizing their swimming pattern in a square tank with shallow water. Trajectories obtained from video recordings were analysed for proximity to the nearest wall. With the exception of young larvae, the vast majority of animals (both tadpoles and froglets) spent a disproportionately large amount of time near the wall. The total distance covered was not a confounding factor, but animals were stronger wall followers in smaller tanks. Wall following was also not influenced by whether the surrounding walls of the tank were black or white, illuminated by infrared light, or by the presence or absence of tentacles. When given a choice in a convex tank to swim straight and leave the wall or turn to follow the wall, the animals consistently left the wall, indicating that wall following in X. laevis is barrier-driven. This implies that wall following behaviour in Xenopus derives from constraints imposed by the environment (or the experimenter) and is unlikely a strategy for spatial learning or safety seeking.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Development; Locomotion; Swimming; Thigmotaxis; Wall following

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29119247     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-017-1227-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  41 in total

1.  A model of animal movements in a bounded space.

Authors:  Raphaël Jeanson; Stéphane Blanco; Richard Fournier; Jean Louis Deneubourg; Vincent Fourcassié; Guy Theraulaz
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2003-12-21       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  A quantification of goldfish behavior by an image processing system.

Authors:  S Kato; K Tamada; Y Shimada; T Chujo
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Thigmotaxis as a test for anxiolytic activity in rats.

Authors:  D Treit; M Fundytus
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.533

4.  Species-specific behavior and acquisition of avoidance behavior in rats.

Authors:  N E Grossen; M J Kelley
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1972-11

5.  Merkel cell distribution in the epidermis as determined by quinacrine fluorescence.

Authors:  C A Nurse; K M Mearow; M Holmes; B Visheau; J Diamond
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 5.249

6.  Cognitive and affective aspects of thigmotaxis strategy in humans.

Authors:  Janos Kallai; Tamas Makany; Arpad Csatho; Kazmer Karadi; David Horvath; Beatrix Kovacs-Labadi; Robert Jarai; Lynn Nadel; Jake W Jacobs
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  The exploratory behavior of rats in an open environment optimizes security.

Authors:  Ian Q Whishaw; Omar A Gharbawie; Benjamin J Clark; Hugo Lehmann
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The dynamic process of cognitive mapping in the absence of visual cues: human data compared with animal studies.

Authors:  Osnat Yaski; Juval Portugali; David Eilam
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Exploration and navigation in the blind mole rat (Spalax ehrenbergi): global calibration as a primer of spatial representation.

Authors:  Reut Avni; Yael Tzvaigrach; David Eilam
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Locomotor activity in common spiny mice (Acomys cahirinuse): the effect of light and environmental complexity.

Authors:  David Eilam
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2004-11-10       Impact factor: 2.964

View more
  1 in total

1.  Identification and functional evaluation of GRIA1 missense and truncation variants in individuals with ID: An emerging neurodevelopmental syndrome.

Authors:  Vardha Ismail; Linda G Zachariassen; Annie Godwin; Mane Sahakian; Sian Ellard; Karen L Stals; Emma Baple; Kate Tatton Brown; Nicola Foulds; Gabrielle Wheway; Matthew O Parker; Signe M Lyngby; Miriam G Pedersen; Julie Desir; Allan Bayat; Maria Musgaard; Matthew Guille; Anders S Kristensen; Diana Baralle
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 11.043

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.