Literature DB >> 17227519

Afternoon colonoscopies have higher failure rates than morning colonoscopies.

Madhusudhan R Sanaka1, Nirav Shah, Kevin D Mullen, D R Ferguson, Charles Thomas, Arthur J McCullough.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are several known predictors of an incomplete colonoscopy or difficult colonoscopy. In addition, inadequate bowel preparation has been reported in procedures scheduled later in the day. Operator fatigue, which tends to be higher as the day passes on, may also impact colonoscopy completion rate. AIMS: To determine the influence of performing outpatient colonoscopies in the afternoon versus morning on the completion rates of colonoscopy and adequacy of bowel preparation.
METHODS: Retrospective chart review of all outpatient colonoscopies performed between November 2003 and October 2004 in the Division of Gastroenterology at MetroHealth Medical Center in Cleveland, Ohio. Patient demographics, indications for procedure, and colonoscopic findings were reviewed. Patients received polyethylene glycol electrolyte-based bowel preparation in the evening prior to the day of the scheduled colonoscopy.
RESULTS: A total of 2,087 colonoscopies was performed, of which 1,084 were in the morning and 999 were in the afternoon. Patients in the morning and afternoon were similar in regards to the known risk factors predictive of an incomplete colonoscopy. The incompletion rate was significantly higher in the afternoon compared to the morning (6.5% vs 4.1%, P= 0.013, OR for incompletion was 1.64, CI 1.11-2.44). Inadequate bowel preparation was found in 167 out of 1,084 (15.4%) colonoscopies in the morning and 197 out of 999 (19.7%) colonoscopies in the afternoon (P= 0.011). Even after excluding incomplete colonoscopies due to poor bowel preparation precluding examination, the incompletion rate was still higher in the afternoon (5% vs 3.2%, P= 0.043, OR 1.60, CI 1.03-2.51).
CONCLUSIONS: Scheduling of colonoscopies in the afternoon compared to the morning may be an independent predictor of an incomplete colonoscopy and inadequate bowel preparation. According to our study findings, scheduling of all outpatient colonoscopies preferentially in the morning would avoid suboptimal procedures in 5% of patients and the need for unnecessary repeat colonoscopy or an alternative imaging study in 2.4% of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17227519     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00887.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  48 in total

1.  Assessing bowel preparation quality using the mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy.

Authors:  Grace Clarke Hillyer; Benjamin Lebwohl; Richard M Rosenberg; Alfred I Neugut; Randi Wolf; Corey H Basch; Jennie Mata; Edwin Hernandez; Douglas A Corley; Steven Shea; Charles E Basch
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.409

2.  Factors associated with adherence to the recommended postpolypectomy surveillance interval.

Authors:  Eun Ran Kim; Dong Hyun Sinn; Jin Yong Kim; Dong Kyung Chang; Poong-Lyul Rhee; Jae J Kim; Jong Chul Rhee; Young-Ho Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Endoscopic management of failed colonoscopy in clinical practice: to change endoscopist, instrument, or both?

Authors:  Sergio Morini; Angelo Zullo; Cesare Hassan; Roberto Lorenzetti; Salvatore M A Campo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Improving the quality of bowel preparation: one step closer to the holy grail?

Authors:  Edward W Holt; Michael S Verhille
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  Endoscopy and polyps-diagnostic and therapeutic advances in management.

Authors:  Scott R Steele; Eric K Johnson; Bradley Champagne; Brad Davis; Sang Lee; David Rivadeneira; Howard Ross; Dana A Hayden; Justin A Maykel
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  The difficult colonoscopy.

Authors:  Todd N Witte; Robert Enns
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.522

7.  Comparative economic evaluation of data from the ACRIN National CT Colonography Trial with three cancer intervention and surveillance modeling network microsimulations.

Authors:  David J Vanness; Amy B Knudsen; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Carolyn M Rutter; Ilana F Gareen; Benjamin A Herman; Karen M Kuntz; Ann G Zauber; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Eric J Feuer; Mei-Hsiu Chen; C Daniel Johnson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Approach to Incomplete Colonoscopy: New Techniques and Technologies.

Authors:  Diana L Franco; Jonathan A Leighton; Suryakanth R Gurudu
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2017-08

9.  Predictors of suboptimal bowel preparation in asymptomatic patients undergoing average-risk screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Shail M Govani; Eric E Elliott; Stacy B Menees; Stephanie L Judd; Sameer D Saini; Constantinos P Anastassiades; Annette L Urganus; Suzanna J Boyce; Philip S Schoenfeld
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-09-16

10.  Risk factors for inadequate colonoscopy bowel preparations in African Americans and whites at an urban medical center.

Authors:  Anoop Appannagari; Shikha Mangla; Chuanhong Liao; K Gautham Reddy; Sonia S Kupfer
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 0.954

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.