Literature DB >> 17227182

Parallel and serial processes in visual search.

Thomas L Thornton1, David L Gilden.   

Abstract

A long-standing issue in the study of how people acquire visual information centers around the scheduling and deployment of attentional resources: Is the process serial, or is it parallel? A substantial empirical effort has been dedicated to resolving this issue (e.g., J. M. Wolfe, 1998a, 1998b). However, the results remain largely inconclusive because the methodologies that have historically been used cannot make the necessary distinctions (J. Palmer, 1995; J. T. Townsend, 1972, 1974, 1990). In this article, the authors develop a rigorous procedure for deciding the scheduling problem in visual search by making improvements in both search methodology and data interpretation. The search method, originally used by A. H. C. van der Heijden (1975), generalizes the traditional single-target methodology by permitting multiple targets. Reaction times and error rates from 29 representative search studies were analyzed using Monte Carlo simulation. Parallel and serial models of attention were defined by coupling the appropriate sequential sampling algorithms to realistic constraints on decision making. The authors found that although most searches are conducted by a parallel limited-capacity process, there is a distinguishable search class that is serial. ((c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17227182     DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.71

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  34 in total

1.  Event-related brain potentials and the efficiency of visual search for vertically and horizontally oriented stimuli.

Authors:  Bruno Kopp; Jasmin Kizilirmak; Carolin Liebscher; Julia Runge; Karl Wessel
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 2.  Serial vs. parallel models of attention in visual search: accounting for benchmark RT-distributions.

Authors:  Rani Moran; Michael Zehetleitner; Heinrich René Liesefeld; Hermann J Müller; Marius Usher
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

3.  Attention searches nonuniformly in space and in time.

Authors:  Laura Dugué; Douglas McLelland; Mathilde Lajous; Rufin VanRullen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The transition from feature to object: Storage unit in visual working memory depends on task difficulty.

Authors:  Jiehui Qian; Ke Zhang; Shengxi Liu; Quan Lei
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-11

5.  Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Todd S Horowitz; Michael J Van Wert; Naomi M Kenner; Skyler S Place; Nour Kibbi
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-11

6.  Studying visual search using systems factorial methodology with target-distractor similarity as the factor.

Authors:  Mario Fifić; James T Townsend; Ami Eidels
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-05

7.  A search-by-clusters model of visual search: fits to data from younger and older adults.

Authors:  William J Hoyer; John Cerella; Norbou G Buchler
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 8.  Speeded multielement decision-making as diffusion in a hypersphere: Theory and application to double-target detection.

Authors:  Philip L Smith; Elaine A Corbett
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

9.  Decision making on spatially continuous scales.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 10.  Diffusion Decision Model: Current Issues and History.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith; Scott D Brown; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.