Literature DB >> 17224487

Patient satisfaction after closed reduction of nasal fractures.

Terry Hung1, Waitsz Chang, Alexander C Vlantis, Michael C F Tong, Charles A van Hasselt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of closed reduction from a patient's point of view, because there is increasing evidence that closed reduction of nasal fractures fails to address deformities of the cartilaginous nasal framework and the septum.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 62 patients who underwent a closed reduction of nasal fracture between July 1, 2002, and June 30, 2005. All patients were interviewed regarding the esthetic and functional outcomes after closed reduction.
RESULTS: Eighteen patients (29%) expressed dissatisfaction with the esthetic outcome of the reduction, and 18 (29%) said they would consider further surgery to correct the residual nasal deformity.
CONCLUSIONS: A stringent preoperative assessment of the nasal fracture, other nasal deformities, and nasal function is essential before offering patients a simple closed reduction of their nasal fractures. A septorhinoplasty, as the definitive procedure, should be offered to patients when a closed reduction is deemed unable to address all deformities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17224487     DOI: 10.1001/archfaci.9.1.40

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg        ISSN: 1521-2491


  9 in total

1.  Role of intra-operative ultrasound-guided reduction of nasal bone fracture in patient satisfaction and patient nasal profile (a randomized clinical trial).

Authors:  Mohamed Abu-Samra; Gehad Selmi; Hanan Mansy; Mahmoud Agha
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Patient aesthetic satisfaction with timing of nasal fracture manipulation.

Authors:  Sunil Dutt Sharma; Ivor Kwame; John Almeyda
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2014-01-02

3.  Applicability and Effectiveness of Closed Reduction of Nasal Fractures under Local Anesthesia.

Authors:  Fernando Vilela; Ronaldo Granjeiro; Carlos Maurício; Patrícia Andrade
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-03-13

4.  Dynamic changes of facial skeletal fractures with time.

Authors:  Bao-Hai Yu; Shu-Man Han; Tao Sun; Zhe Guo; Lei Cao; Hui-Zhao Wu; Yun-Heng Shi; Jin-Xu Wen; Wen-Juan Wu; Bu-Lang Gao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Long-term postoperative satisfaction and complications in nasal bone fracture patients according to fracture type, site, and severity.

Authors:  Min Hyub Choi; Ji Seon Cheon; Kyung Min Son; Woo Young Choi
Journal:  Arch Craniofac Surg       Date:  2020-02-20

6.  Comparison of Double Lateral Osteotomy and Asymmetric Dorsal Hump Reduction in Correction of Crooked Nose.

Authors:  Ali Goljanian Tabrizi; Matin Ghazizadeh; Behrouz Barati; Sara Nouri
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2020-09

7.  Suprapubic Cholecystectomy Improves Cosmetic Outcome Compared to Classic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Anas Taha; Stephanie Taha-Mehlitz; Ulrich Sternkopf; Elena Sorba; Bassey Enodien; Stephan Vorburger
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 4.964

8.  Risk Factors for Corrective Septorhinoplasty Associated With Initial Treatment of Isolated Nasal Fracture.

Authors:  Kevin Li; Sami P Moubayed; Emily Spataro; Sam P Most
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 4.611

9.  Effectiveness of endoscopic intranasal incision reduction for nasal fractures.

Authors:  Shu Yan; Yan Jiang; Yan Wang; Kaixuan Chen; Xudong Yan; Xiaohan Sun; Jisheng Zhang; Na Li
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 2.503

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.