Literature DB >> 17223921

Repeat prostate biopsy in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian cancer screening trial.

Paul F Pinsky1, E David Crawford, Barnett S Kramer, Gerald L Andriole, Edward P Gelmann, Robert Grubb, Robert Greenlee, John K Gohagan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine patterns of repeat prostate biopsy in a cohort of men undergoing prostate cancer screening who have a negative initial biopsy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The Prostate, Colorectal, Lung, and Ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial is an ongoing study the prostate component of which consists of six annual screens with measurements of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and a digital rectal examination (DRE). The diagnostic follow-up of positive screening results is done by the subject's healthcare provider outside the purview of the PLCO. We analysed the experience of repeat biopsy in men in the PLCO with an initial negative biopsy. Men were divided by indication for initial biopsy into those with suspicious PSA levels and those with suspicious DRE findings.
RESULTS: The probability of having a repeat biopsy within 3 years of initial biopsy was 43% for 1736 men with suspicious PSA levels and 13% for 1025 men with suspicious DRE findings. Rates of third and fourth biopsy after a previous negative biopsy were similar to the initial repeat biopsy rate in PSA-positive men. Most men had a repeat biopsy only after having an additional round of screening. The PSA level and PSA velocity determined after initial biopsy were independent risk factors for a repeat biopsy, both in PSA-positive and DRE-positive men. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia was a risk factor for repeat biopsy before any repeat PSA or DRE testing.
CONCLUSION: The experience of this cohort should be generally representative of patterns of care for repeat biopsy in men undergoing periodic screening. These data can provide context to the debate over optimum practices for repeat biopsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17223921     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06708.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  13 in total

1.  Prostate cancer: MR-TRUS fusion biopsy--defining a new standard.

Authors:  Eric A Klein
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Prevention and early detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jack Cuzick; Mangesh A Thorat; Gerald Andriole; Otis W Brawley; Powel H Brown; Zoran Culig; Rosalind A Eeles; Leslie G Ford; Freddie C Hamdy; Lars Holmberg; Dragan Ilic; Timothy J Key; Carlo La Vecchia; Hans Lilja; Michael Marberger; Frank L Meyskens; Lori M Minasian; Chris Parker; Howard L Parnes; Sven Perner; Harry Rittenhouse; Jack Schalken; Hans-Peter Schmid; Bernd J Schmitz-Dräger; Fritz H Schröder; Arnulf Stenzl; Bertrand Tombal; Timothy J Wilt; Alicja Wolk
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  The prostate cancer conundrum revisited: treatment changes and prostate cancer mortality declines.

Authors:  Ruth Etzioni; Roman Gulati; Alex Tsodikov; Elisabeth M Wever; David F Penson; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Jeffrey Katcher; Gerrit Draisma; Eric J Feuer; Harry J de Koning; Angela B Mariotto
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Screening for prostate cancer: a controversy or fact.

Authors:  S Stavridis; S Saidi; Lj Lekovski; S Dohcev; G Spasovski
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 0.471

5.  Use of the Prostate Core Mitomic Test in Repeated Biopsy Decision-Making: Real-World Assessment of Clinical Utility in a Multicenter Patient Population.

Authors:  Lorena Legisi; Elise DeSa; M Nasar Qureshi
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2016-12

6.  The impact of PLCO control arm contamination on perceived PSA screening efficacy.

Authors:  Roman Gulati; Alex Tsodikov; Elisabeth M Wever; Angela B Mariotto; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Jeffrey Katcher; Harry J de Koning; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  Prostate-specific antigen/solvent interaction analysis: a preliminary evaluation of a new assay concept for detecting prostate cancer using urinary samples.

Authors:  Mark Stovsky; Lee Ponsky; Srinivas Vourganti; Peter Stuhldreher; Mike B Siroky; Victor Kipnis; Olga Fedotoff; Larissa Mikheeva; Boris Zaslavsky; Arnon Chait; J Stephen Jones
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Budget impact model: epigenetic assay can help avoid unnecessary repeated prostate biopsies and reduce healthcare spending.

Authors:  Wade Aubry; Robert Lieberthal; Arnold Willis; Grant Bagley; Simon M Willis; Andrew Layton
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2013-01

9.  Reduced Rate of Repeated Prostate Biopsies Observed in ConfirmMDx Clinical Utility Field Study.

Authors:  Kirk J Wojno; Frank J Costa; Robert J Cornell; Jeffrey D Small; Erik Pasin; Wim Van Criekinge; Joseph W Bigley; Leander Van Neste
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2014-05

10.  Clinical validation of an epigenetic assay to predict negative histopathological results in repeat prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Alan W Partin; Leander Van Neste; Eric A Klein; Leonard S Marks; Jason R Gee; Dean A Troyer; Kimberly Rieger-Christ; J Stephen Jones; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi; Leslie A Mangold; Bruce J Trock; Raymond S Lance; Joseph W Bigley; Wim Van Criekinge; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.