Literature DB >> 17223409

Comparison of effects of high (80 mg) versus low (20 mg) dose of simvastatin on C-reactive protein and lipoproteins in patients with angiographic evidence of coronary arterial narrowing.

Kent G Meredith1, Benjamin D Horne, Robert R Pearson, Chloe Allen Maycock, Donald L Lappe, Jeffrey L Anderson, Joseph B Muhlestein.   

Abstract

Although previous studies have demonstrated that various "statins" decrease levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), the dose-response relation for lowering hs-CRP by the clinically important drug simvastatin compared with lipid lowering is unclear. A 16-week, randomized, double-blind study was performed in patients with stable coronary artery disease and high hs-CRP levels (>3 mg/L). Subjects were randomized to placebo, 20 mg of simvastatin, or 80 mg of simvastatin for 12 weeks. Those currently on a statin first underwent a 4-week washout. Of the 107 total patients randomized, 96 completed the trial, and 89 were able to be evaluated for efficacy. Changes in hs-CRP differed across simvastatin and placebo groups (change score +1.6 vs -0.6 mg/L, p = 0.004), but no dose response was observed when comparing 80 with 20 mg/day (-0.6 vs -0.5 mg/L, respectively). A strong dose response was observed for changes in total (p <0.01) and low-density lipoprotein (p <0.001) cholesterol. hs-CRP changes did not correlate with low-density lipoprotein changes. In conclusion, this randomized trial in patients with chronic stable coronary artery disease showed a strong dose response for simvastatin for total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering but not for hs-CRP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17223409     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.07.079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  6 in total

1.  Which statin worked best to achieve lipid level targets in a European registry? A post-hoc analysis of the EUROASPIRE III for coronary heart disease patients.

Authors:  Fahad Alnouri; David Wood; Kornelia Kotseva; Mohamed E A Ibrahim
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2014-05-04

2.  Effect of Antihypertensive and Statin Medication Use on Muscle Performance in Community-Dwelling Older Adults Performing Strength Training.

Authors:  Mohammad Alturki; Keliane Liberman; Andreas Delaere; Liza De Dobbeleer; Veerle Knoop; Tony Mets; Siddhartha Lieten; Bert Bravenboer; Ingo Beyer; Ivan Bautmans
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Cardiovascular and economic outcomes after initiation of lipid-lowering therapy with atorvastatin vs simvastatin in an employed population.

Authors:  Ross J Simpson; James Signorovitch; Howard Birnbaum; Jasmina Ivanova; Cristina Connolly; Yohanne Kidolezi; Andreas Kuznik
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  Comparison effect of atorvastatin (10 versus 80 mg) on biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress in subjects with metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Uma Singh; Sridevi Devaraj; Ishwarlal Jialal; David Siegel
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Simvastatin improves flow-mediated dilation but reduces adiponectin levels and insulin sensitivity in hypercholesterolemic patients.

Authors:  Kwang Kon Koh; Michael J Quon; Seung Hwan Han; Yonghee Lee; Jeong Yeal Ahn; Soo Jin Kim; Yesl Koh; Eak Kyun Shin
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 6.  Fenofibrate/simvastatin fixed-dose combination in the treatment of mixed dyslipidemia: safety, efficacy, and place in therapy.

Authors:  Nicola Tarantino; Francesco Santoro; Luisa De Gennaro; Michele Correale; Francesca Guastafierro; Antonio Gaglione; Matteo Di Biase; Natale Daniele Brunetti
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2017-02-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.