AIMS: Brief alcohol interventions typically have been directed to heavy-drinking patients seeking primary health care and college students. This study examined the efficacy of mailing brief personalized assessment-feedbackto interested drinkers recruited from the general public. We hypothesized that problem drinkers would benefit more from the intervention than individuals who were not problem drinkers. DESIGN: A two-arm, double-blinded, community-based randomized controlled trial with 6-month follow-up. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A screening interview was administered to a stratified random sample of 10 014 Canadians 18 years of age and older (5621 women and 4393 men; M age = 43.3 years, SD = 15.99; response rate = 65.4%). INTERVENTION: Current drinkers interested in receiving alcohol self-help materials (n = 1727) were assigned randomly to receive brief personalized assessment-feedbackon male and female population drinking norms by mail, or to a delayed-treatment control group, and were contacted 6 months later (76% retention rate). MEASUREMENTS: Problem drinking status at baseline [using sex-specific Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) cut scores], and frequency and quantity of alcohol use at follow-up. FINDINGS: Analysis of covariance identified the hypothesized interaction of baseline problem drinking status and treatment condition (P < 0.01). Among problem drinkers identified at baseline the intervention caused a 10.1% reduction in per-occasion binge drinking compared to controls, whereas there was no difference in binge drinking across conditions for non-problem drinkers. CONCLUSIONS: The continuum of care for alcohol problems can be broadened by providing brief interventions to interested drinkers in the general population.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: Brief alcohol interventions typically have been directed to heavy-drinking patients seeking primary health care and college students. This study examined the efficacy of mailing brief personalized assessment-feedback to interested drinkers recruited from the general public. We hypothesized that problem drinkers would benefit more from the intervention than individuals who were not problem drinkers. DESIGN: A two-arm, double-blinded, community-based randomized controlled trial with 6-month follow-up. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A screening interview was administered to a stratified random sample of 10 014 Canadians 18 years of age and older (5621 women and 4393 men; M age = 43.3 years, SD = 15.99; response rate = 65.4%). INTERVENTION: Current drinkers interested in receiving alcohol self-help materials (n = 1727) were assigned randomly to receive brief personalized assessment-feedback on male and female population drinking norms by mail, or to a delayed-treatment control group, and were contacted 6 months later (76% retention rate). MEASUREMENTS: Problem drinking status at baseline [using sex-specific Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) cut scores], and frequency and quantity of alcohol use at follow-up. FINDINGS: Analysis of covariance identified the hypothesized interaction of baseline problem drinking status and treatment condition (P < 0.01). Among problem drinkers identified at baseline the intervention caused a 10.1% reduction in per-occasion binge drinking compared to controls, whereas there was no difference in binge drinking across conditions for non-problem drinkers. CONCLUSIONS: The continuum of care for alcohol problems can be broadened by providing brief interventions to interested drinkers in the general population.
Authors: Alexis N Kuerbis; Stanley E Yuan; Jenna Borok; Peter M LeFevre; Gloria S Kim; Daryl Lum; Karina D Ramirez; Diana H Liao; Alison A Moore Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2015-01-30 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Carmen V Voogt; Evelien A P Poelen; Marloes Kleinjan; Lex A C J Lemmers; Rutger C M E Engels Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-04-14 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Renske Spijkerman; Marion A E Roek; Ad Vermulst; Lex Lemmers; Annemarie Huiberts; Rutger C M E Engels Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2010-12-19 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Anders Blædel Gottlieb Hansen; Ulrik Becker; Anette Søgaard Nielsen; Morten Grønbæk; Janne Schurmann Tolstrup; Lau Caspar Thygesen Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2012-07-30 Impact factor: 5.428