OBJECTIVES: To determine the initial efficacy of a mailed screening and brief intervention to reduce at-risk drinking in persons aged 50 and older. DESIGN: Pilot randomized controlled trial. SETTING: University of California at Los Angeles Department of Medicine Community Offices and Primary Care Network. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 50 and older who were identified as at-risk drinkers according to the Comorbidity Alcohol Risk Evaluation Tool (CARET) (N = 86). INTERVENTION: Participants were assigned randomly to receive personalized mailed feedback outlining their specific risks associated with alcohol use, an educational booklet on alcohol and aging, and the National Institutes of Health RethinkingDrinking: Alcohol and Your Health booklet (intervention group) or nothing (control group). MEASUREMENTS: Alcohol-related assessments at baseline and 3 months; CARET-assessed at-risk drinking, number of risks, and types of risks. RESULTS: At 3 months, fewer intervention group participants than controls were at-risk drinkers (66% vs 88%), binge drinking (45% vs 68%), using alcohol with a medical or psychiatric condition (3% vs 17%), or having symptoms of such a condition (29% vs 49%). CONCLUSION: A brief mailed intervention may be an effective approach to intervening with at-risk drinkers aged 50 and older.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To determine the initial efficacy of a mailed screening and brief intervention to reduce at-risk drinking in persons aged 50 and older. DESIGN: Pilot randomized controlled trial. SETTING: University of California at Los Angeles Department of Medicine Community Offices and Primary Care Network. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 50 and older who were identified as at-risk drinkers according to the Comorbidity Alcohol Risk Evaluation Tool (CARET) (N = 86). INTERVENTION: Participants were assigned randomly to receive personalized mailed feedback outlining their specific risks associated with alcohol use, an educational booklet on alcohol and aging, and the National Institutes of Health Rethinking Drinking: Alcohol and Your Health booklet (intervention group) or nothing (control group). MEASUREMENTS: Alcohol-related assessments at baseline and 3 months; CARET-assessed at-risk drinking, number of risks, and types of risks. RESULTS: At 3 months, fewer intervention group participants than controls were at-risk drinkers (66% vs 88%), binge drinking (45% vs 68%), using alcohol with a medical or psychiatric condition (3% vs 17%), or having symptoms of such a condition (29% vs 49%). CONCLUSION: A brief mailed intervention may be an effective approach to intervening with at-risk drinkers aged 50 and older.
Authors: A A Moore; S C Morton; J C Beck; R D Hays; S M Oishi; J M Partridge; B J Genovese; A Fink Journal: Med Care Date: 1999-02 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: T Cameron Wild; Amanda B Roberts; John Cunningham; Donald Schopflocher; Hannah Pazderka-Robinson Journal: Can J Public Health Date: 2004 Mar-Apr
Authors: Denise M Scott; Hanno Petras; Nnenna Kalu; Gloria E Cain; Dietrich B Johnson; Zili Sloboda; Robert Emory Taylor Journal: Prev Sci Date: 2020-10
Authors: Andy Towers; Ágnes Szabó; David A L Newcombe; Janie Sheridan; Allison A Moore; Martin Hyde; Annie Britton; Priscilla Martinez; Nadia Minicuci; Paul Kowal; Thomas Clausen; Christine L Savage Journal: J Aging Health Date: 2018-08-27
Authors: Gail L Rose; Gary J Badger; Joan M Skelly; Tonya A Ferraro; Charles D MacLean; John E Helzer Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-05-20 Impact factor: 5.128