Literature DB >> 17220629

Utility of behavioral versus cognitive measures in differentiating between subtypes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration and Alzheimer's disease.

Jennifer Heidler-Gary1, Rebecca Gottesman, Melissa Newhart, Shannon Chang, Lynda Ken, Argye E Hillis.   

Abstract

We hypothesized that a modified version of the Frontal Behavioral Inventory (FBI-mod), along with a few cognitive tests, would be clinically useful in distinguishing between clinically defined Alzheimer's disease (AD) and subtypes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD): frontotemporal dementia (dysexecutive type), progressive nonfluent aphasia, and semantic dementia. We studied 80 patients who were diagnosed with AD (n = 30) or FTLD (n = 50), on the basis of a comprehensive neuropsychological battery, imaging, neurological examination, and history. We found significant between-group differences on the FBI-mod, two subtests of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (verbal learning and delayed recall), and the Trail Making Test Part B (one measure of 'executive functioning'). AD was characterized by relatively severe impairment in verbal learning, delayed recall, and executive functioning, with relatively normal scores on the FBI-mod. Frontotemporal dementia was characterized by relatively severe impairment on the FBI-mod and executive functioning in the absence of severe impairment in verbal learning and recall. Progressive nonfluent aphasia was characterized by severe impairment in executive functioning with relatively normal scores on verbal learning and recall and FBI-mod. Finally, semantic dementia was characterized by relatively severe deficits in delayed recall, but relatively normal performance on new learning, executive functioning, and on FBI-mod. Discriminant function analysis confirmed that the FBI-mod, in conjunction with the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, and the Trail Making Test Part B categorized the majority of patients as subtypes of FTLD or AD in the same way as a full neuropsychological battery, neurological examination, complete history, and imaging. These tests may be useful for efficient clinical diagnosis, although progressive nonfluent aphasia and semantic dementia are likely to be best distinguished by language tests not included in standard neuropsychological test batteries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17220629     DOI: 10.1159/000098562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord        ISSN: 1420-8008            Impact factor:   2.959


  11 in total

Review 1.  Language, executive function and social cognition in the diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia syndromes.

Authors:  Michał Harciarek; Stephanie Cosentino
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2013-04

Review 2.  Clinical diagnostic criteria and classification controversies in frontotemporal lobar degeneration.

Authors:  Katya Rascovsky; Murray Grossman
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2013-04

Review 3.  Update on frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  Zoe Arvanitakis
Journal:  Neurologist       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.398

4.  Automated MRI-based classification of primary progressive aphasia variants.

Authors:  Stephen M Wilson; Jennifer M Ogar; Victor Laluz; Matthew Growdon; Jung Jang; Shenly Glenn; Bruce L Miller; Michael W Weiner; Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Memory profiles in pathology or biomarker confirmed Alzheimer disease and frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  Yael Mansoor; Laura Jastrzab; Shubir Dutt; Bruce L Miller; William W Seeley; Joel H Kramer
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.703

6.  Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  Katya Rascovsky; John R Hodges; David Knopman; Mario F Mendez; Joel H Kramer; John Neuhaus; John C van Swieten; Harro Seelaar; Elise G P Dopper; Chiadi U Onyike; Argye E Hillis; Keith A Josephs; Bradley F Boeve; Andrew Kertesz; William W Seeley; Katherine P Rankin; Julene K Johnson; Maria-Luisa Gorno-Tempini; Howard Rosen; Caroline E Prioleau-Latham; Albert Lee; Christopher M Kipps; Patricia Lillo; Olivier Piguet; Jonathan D Rohrer; Martin N Rossor; Jason D Warren; Nick C Fox; Douglas Galasko; David P Salmon; Sandra E Black; Marsel Mesulam; Sandra Weintraub; Brad C Dickerson; Janine Diehl-Schmid; Florence Pasquier; Vincent Deramecourt; Florence Lebert; Yolande Pijnenburg; Tiffany W Chow; Facundo Manes; Jordan Grafman; Stefano F Cappa; Morris Freedman; Murray Grossman; Bruce L Miller
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Differentiating between subtypes of primary progressive aphasia and mild cognitive impairment on a modified version of the Frontal Behavioral Inventory.

Authors:  Donna C Tippett; Carol B Thompson; Cornelia Demsky; Rajani Sebastian; Amy Wright; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Neuropsychological differences between frontotemporal lobar degeneration and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Claudia Sellitto Porto; Valeria Santoro Bahia; Sonia Maria Dozzi Brucki; Paulo Caramelli; Ricardo Nitrini
Journal:  Dement Neuropsychol       Date:  2008 Jul-Sep

9.  Re-evaluation of clinical dementia diagnoses with pittsburgh compound B positron emission tomography.

Authors:  M Degerman Gunnarsson; M Lindau; A F Santillo; A Wall; H Engler; L Lannfelt; H Basun; L Kilander
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra       Date:  2013-12-14

Review 10.  Meta-analytic Review of Memory Impairment in Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia.

Authors:  Jackie M Poos; Lize C Jiskoot; Janne M Papma; John C van Swieten; Esther van den Berg
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 2.892

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.