OBJECTIVE: Recent findings suggest that the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), its receptor (uPAR), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), and -2 (PAI-2) play key roles in cancer invasion. The prognostic value of components of this system is well established in breast cancer. However, little is known of its involvement in pancreatic cancer (PC). METHODS: Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (Q-RT-PCR) was used on tissue-banked specimens and immunohistochemistry (IHC) on paraffin specimens was used to measure expression of uPA, uPAR, PAI-1, and PAI-2 proteins in 46 PC and 12 cystadenoma specimens. Results were related to survival using Cox's proportional hazards testing. RESULTS: Increased expression of uPA, uPAR, and PAI-1 in PC tissue were independently associated with a higher Union Internationale Contre le Cancer [International Union Against Cancer (UICC)] tumor stage (P < 0.001) and were intercorrelated (P < 0.001). Overexpression of uPAR indicated reduced survival (P = 0.03). Conversely, PAI-2 messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) overexpression, which occurred in 21 of 46 tumors, negatively correlated with tumor size (P = 0.008) and survival (P < 0.007) but not with uPA, uPAR, or tumor stage. There was good agreement between PAI-2 mRNA value and IHC score (P < 0.001). Using Cox's stepwise analysis, PAI-2 mRNA value (HR = 0.24; P = 0.001) and UICC tumor stage (HR = 2.014; P = 0.001) independently predicted survival. An IHC score for PAI-2 of 3+ or 4+ also independently predicted improved survival (HR = 2.72; P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: The uPA/uPAR/PAI-1 system is activated in advanced pancreatic cancer and may account for the tumor's aggressive behavior, whereas PAI-2 expression appears to be independent of uPA/uPAR/PAI-1 and is associated with improved prognosis. Because of its intercorrelation with mRNA expression, PAI-2 IHC may be used as an indicator of survival.
OBJECTIVE: Recent findings suggest that the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), its receptor (uPAR), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), and -2 (PAI-2) play key roles in cancer invasion. The prognostic value of components of this system is well established in breast cancer. However, little is known of its involvement in pancreatic cancer (PC). METHODS: Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (Q-RT-PCR) was used on tissue-banked specimens and immunohistochemistry (IHC) on paraffin specimens was used to measure expression of uPA, uPAR, PAI-1, and PAI-2 proteins in 46 PC and 12 cystadenoma specimens. Results were related to survival using Cox's proportional hazards testing. RESULTS: Increased expression of uPA, uPAR, and PAI-1 in PC tissue were independently associated with a higher Union Internationale Contre le Cancer [International Union Against Cancer (UICC)] tumor stage (P < 0.001) and were intercorrelated (P < 0.001). Overexpression of uPAR indicated reduced survival (P = 0.03). Conversely, PAI-2 messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) overexpression, which occurred in 21 of 46 tumors, negatively correlated with tumor size (P = 0.008) and survival (P < 0.007) but not with uPA, uPAR, or tumor stage. There was good agreement between PAI-2 mRNA value and IHC score (P < 0.001). Using Cox's stepwise analysis, PAI-2 mRNA value (HR = 0.24; P = 0.001) and UICC tumor stage (HR = 2.014; P = 0.001) independently predicted survival. An IHC score for PAI-2 of 3+ or 4+ also independently predicted improved survival (HR = 2.72; P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: The uPA/uPAR/PAI-1 system is activated in advanced pancreatic cancer and may account for the tumor's aggressive behavior, whereas PAI-2 expression appears to be independent of uPA/uPAR/PAI-1 and is associated with improved prognosis. Because of its intercorrelation with mRNA expression, PAI-2 IHC may be used as an indicator of survival.
Authors: M Fredstorp-Lidebring; P O Bendahl; N Brünner; B Casslén; T Högberg; E Långström-Einarsson; R Willén; M Fernö Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: J A Foekens; H A Peters; M P Look; H Portengen; M Schmitt; M D Kramer; N Brünner; F Jänicke; M E Meijer-van Gelder; S C Henzen-Logmans; W L van Putten; J G Klijn Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2000-02-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: H Friess; D Cantero; H Graber; W H Tang; X Guo; M Kashiwagi; A Zimmermann; L Gold; M Korc; M W Büchler Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 1997-09 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Barry J Allen; Chand Raja; Syed Rizvi; Yong Li; Wendy Tsui; David Zhang; Emma Song; Chang Fa Qu; John Kearsley; Peter Graham; John Thompson Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2004-08-21 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Ahmedin Jemal; Ram C Tiwari; Taylor Murray; Asma Ghafoor; Alicia Samuels; Elizabeth Ward; Eric J Feuer; Michael J Thun Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2004 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Shashi R Harvey; Thelma C Hurd; Gabor Markus; Maisie I Martinick; Remedios M Penetrante; Dongfeng Tan; Preeti Venkataraman; Nisha DeSouza; Sheila N J Sait; Deborah L Driscoll; John F Gibbs Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2003-10-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: D Cantero; H Friess; J Deflorin; A Zimmermann; M A Bründler; E Riesle; M Korc; M W Büchler Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 1997 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Wilson Petrushnko; Justin S Gundara; Philip R De Reuver; Greg O'Grady; Jaswinder S Samra; Anubhav Mittal Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2016-07-14 Impact factor: 3.647