Literature DB >> 17218653

Forefoot loading during 3 athletic tasks.

Robin M Queen1, Benjamin B Haynes, W Mack Hardaker, William E Garrett.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Due to the popularity of soccer and the high incidence of injury among soccer players, it is valuable to know the effects of tasks like side cuts, crossover cuts, and forward acceleration on the foot.
PURPOSE: To determine the differences in forefoot loading during three different athletic tasks. STUDY
DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study.
METHODS: Thirty-six subjects (17 women and 19 men) were tested. Subjects ran a slalom-style agility course 5 times while plantar pressure data was collected at 100 Hz. Plantar pressure was recorded under both feet; however, a right-foot contact was used in the analysis of the side-cut task, a left-foot plant was used in the analysis of the crossover cut, and an average of the 3 steps of acceleration were used in the analysis. The peak pressure, contact area, and contact time for the entire foot were compared between the 3 tasks. The force and the force-time integral were obtained during 5 trials for each of the 3 tasks. The foot was divided into 8 masked regions, which were used to determine the loading patterns specifically in the forefoot. Each variable was analyzed using a 1 x 3 analysis of variance to determine differences between the three movement tasks in the forefoot region (a = .05).
RESULTS: Significant differences in peak pressure, contact area, and contact time existed between the movement tasks when examining the entire foot. In addition, significant differences in the force-time integral and peak pressure in the forefoot existed between the movement tasks. The force-time integral was highest during the side cut in the medial forefoot, hallux, and the lesser toes, while the force-time integral was highest during the crossover cut in the middle forefoot and the lateral forefoot. Similarly, the peak pressure was highest during the side cut in the medial forefoot, hallux, and the lesser toes, while peak pressure was highest in the middle forefoot during the acceleration task and highest in the lateral forefoot during the crossover-cutting task.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrated that the crossover cut places an increased load on the lateral portion of the forefoot, while the side-cut task places an increased load on the medial portion of the forefoot and the acceleration task places increased load on the middle forefoot. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The differences in loading patterns based on athletic task are important for understanding potential injury mechanisms. In addition, this information could be important for defining a return to play protocol for athletes who have had specific injuries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17218653     DOI: 10.1177/0363546506295938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  13 in total

1.  Plantar loading during cutting while wearing a rigid carbon fiber insert.

Authors:  Robin M Queen; Alicia N Abbey; Ravi Verma; Robert J Butler; James A Nunley
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Ground Reaction Forces and Temporal Characteristics Define Cutting Performance.

Authors:  M L Welinski; L N Lee; B McBroom; B Mufarreh; A D Gidley
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2021-04-01

3.  Range limitation in hip internal rotation and fifth metatarsal stress fractures (Jones fracture) in professional football players.

Authors:  Yoshitomo Saita; Masashi Nagao; Takayuki Kawasaki; Yohei Kobayashi; Keiji Kobayashi; Hiroki Nakajima; Yuji Takazawa; Kazuo Kaneko; Hiroshi Ikeda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Increased plantar force and impulse in American football players with high arch compared to normal arch.

Authors:  Daniel W Carson; Gregory D Myer; Timothy E Hewett; Robert S Heidt; Kevin R Ford
Journal:  Foot (Edinb)       Date:  2012-11-08

5.  Changes in plantar loading based on shoe type and sex during a jump-landing task.

Authors:  Justin C Debiasio; Mary E Russell; Robert J Butler; James A Nunley; Robin M Queen
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Foot Posture and Plantar Loading With Ankle Bracing.

Authors:  Laura C Dickerson; Robin M Queen
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Foot plantar pressure measurement system: a review.

Authors:  Abdul Hadi Abdul Razak; Aladin Zayegh; Rezaul K Begg; Yufridin Wahab
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  A wireless flexible sensorized insole for gait analysis.

Authors:  Simona Crea; Marco Donati; Stefano Marco Maria De Rossi; Calogero Maria Oddo; Nicola Vitiello
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Plantar Stress-Related Injuries in Male Basketball Players: Variations on Plantar Loads during Different Maximum-Effort Maneuvers.

Authors:  Yiyang Chen; Jing Xian Li; Youlian Hong; Lin Wang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Do Strike Patterns or Shoe Conditions have a Predominant Influence on Foot Loading?

Authors:  Xiaole Sun; Yang Yang; Lin Wang; Xini Zhang; Weijie Fu
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 2.193

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.