Literature DB >> 17218619

Use of flow-volume curves to predict oral appliance treatment outcome in obstructive sleep apnea.

Biao Zeng1, Andrew T Ng, M Ali Darendeliler, Peter Petocz, Peter A Cistulli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It has been recognized that mandibular advancement splint (MAS) treatment is effective in some, but not all, patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Hence there is a need for a simple and reliable clinical tool to assist in the differentiation of treatment responses. We hypothesized that abnormalities of flow-volume curves, together with other clinical variables, may have clinical utility in the prediction of MAS treatment outcome.
METHODS: Fifty-four patients with known OSA underwent MAS treatment. Expiratory and inspiratory flow-volume curves were measured in the erect and supine positions to derive midinspiratory flow (MIF(50)) and the ratio of expiratory to inspiratory flow at 50% of vital capacity (MEF(50):MIF(50)). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify additional significant clinical variables in the prediction of treatment outcome.
RESULTS: The mean (+/- SD) apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) in 35 responders was significantly reduced from 28.9 +/- 13.7 to 6.7 +/- 5.8/hour (p<0.001). In 19 nonresponders there was no significant change in AHI. MIF(50) was lower (6.04 +/- 1.80 vs. 6.88 +/- 1.08 L/second; p=0.035) and the MEF(50):MIF(50) ratio was higher (0.82 +/- 0.23 vs. 0.61 +/- 0.15; p=0.001) in responders than nonresponders. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the MEF(50):MIF(50) ratio was the most important predictive factor for MAS treatment outcome, but that body mass index, age, and baseline AHI were also contributory.
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that flow-volume curves, in combination with other factors such as body mass index, age, and baseline AHI, may have a useful clinical role in the prediction of treatment outcome with MAS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17218619     DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200608-1205OC

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  16 in total

1.  Cephalometry and prediction of oral appliance treatment outcome.

Authors:  Andrew Tze Ming Ng; M Ali Darendeliler; Peter Petocz; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 2.816

2.  Oral Appliance Treatment Response and Polysomnographic Phenotypes of Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Authors:  Kate Sutherland; Hisashi Takaya; Jin Qian; Peter Petocz; Andrew T Ng; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.062

3.  A Feedback-Controlled Mandibular Positioner Identifies Individuals With Sleep Apnea Who Will Respond to Oral Appliance Therapy.

Authors:  John E Remmers; Zbigniew Topor; Joshua Grosse; Nikola Vranjes; Erin V Mosca; Rollin Brant; Sabina Bruehlmann; Shouresh Charkhandeh; Seyed Abdolali Zareian Jahromi
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 4.062

4.  CPAP pressure for prediction of oral appliance treatment response in obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Kate Sutherland; Craig L Phillips; Amanda Davies; Vasanth K Srinivasan; Oyku Dalci; Brendon J Yee; M Ali Darendeliler; Ronald R Grunstein; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 4.062

5.  A combination appliance for obstructive sleep apnea: the effectiveness of mandibular advancement and tongue retention.

Authors:  Leslie Dort; John Remmers
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.062

6.  Influence of oral and craniofacial dimensions on mandibular advancement splint treatment outcome in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Whitney Mostafiz; Oyku Dalci; Kate Sutherland; Atul Malhotra; Vasanth Srinivasan; M Ali Darendeliler; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Comparative effects of two oral appliances on upper airway structure in obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Kate Sutherland; Sheryn A Deane; Andrew S L Chan; Richard J Schwab; Andrew T Ng; M Ali Darendeliler; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 5.849

8.  Influence of nasal resistance on oral appliance treatment outcome in obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Biao Zeng; Andrew T Ng; Jin Qian; Peter Petocz; M Ali Darendeliler; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.849

9.  Three-dimensional assessment of anatomical balance and oral appliance treatment outcome in obstructive sleep apnoea.

Authors:  Kate Sutherland; Andrew S L Chan; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 2.816

Review 10.  Oral appliance treatment for obstructive sleep apnea: an update.

Authors:  Kate Sutherland; Olivier M Vanderveken; Hiroko Tsuda; Marie Marklund; Frederic Gagnadoux; Clete A Kushida; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 4.062

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.