Literature DB >> 17217319

Medical costs of chronic musculoskeletal pain in Italy.

Livio Garattini1, Daniela Koleva, Nicola Motterlini, Dante Cornago.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Musculoskeletal system problems are responsible for more than two-thirds of painful conditions in primary care. However, only one published study, conducted in Finland, has analysed the costs of managing musculoskeletal pain as a whole in primary care. This study analysed the costs of diagnosing and treating chronic musculoskeletal pain in primary care in Italy. A secondary aim of the study was to assess the impact of different drug treatment patterns on medical costs associated with musculoskeletal pain.
METHODS: Chronic pain of musculoskeletal origin was defined as continuous or recurrent pain persisting over 3 months with involvement of the musculoskeletal system, i.e. arising from primary musculoskeletal disorders or from the late consequences of external events (injuries, medical care or surgery). A total of 52 general practitioners (GPs) recruited 581 patients. We focussed on the differences between patients treated (410) and not treated (171) with drugs. Within the treated group, we also analysed subgroups given non-selective NSAID-based therapy (subgroup A, 169 patients) or cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor-based therapy (subgroup B, 52 patients).
RESULTS: The annual average cost of treating a patient with chronic musculoskeletal pain was euro 212.60. Hospital admissions and GP consultations were the largest cost components, both accounting for around a quarter of the total cost. Not surprisingly, the treated group included older patients, who had more co-morbidities and more severe pain. This was associated with annual costs more than four times those of untreated patients (euro 274.50 vs euro 63.90, respectively). Subgroups A and B did not differ with respect to major demographic and clinical variables except in relation to mean age (63 vs 70 years, respectively; p=0.037). They had similar per-patient costs (euro 186.20 vs euro 172.90), although these totals comprised a different mix of components.
CONCLUSION: The analysis showed that the annual average cost of treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain in Italy varied considerably depending on whether drug treatment was used. COX-2 inhibitors and traditional NSAIDs had similar per-patient costs, although this similarity stemmed from a different mix of components.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17217319     DOI: 10.2165/00044011-200727020-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Drug Investig        ISSN: 1173-2563            Impact factor:   2.859


  24 in total

Review 1.  Assessing global pain severity by self-report in clinical and health services research.

Authors:  M Von Korff; M P Jensen; P Karoly
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Analysis of cost data in randomized trials: an application of the non-parametric bootstrap.

Authors:  J A Barber; S G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Quality of life and cost of care of back pain patients in Finnish general practice.

Authors:  Heikki M Hemmilä
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Chronic musculoskeletal pain, prevalence rates, and sociodemographic associations in a Swedish population study.

Authors:  S Bergman; P Herrström; K Högström; I F Petersson; B Svensson; L T Jacobsson
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.666

5.  Cost-of-illness of neck pain in The Netherlands in 1996.

Authors:  J A Borghouts; B W Koes; H Vondeling; L M Bouter
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  An economic model for determining the costs and consequences of using various treatment alternatives for the management of arthritis in Canada.

Authors:  R A Zabinski; T A Burke; J Johnson; F Lavoie; C Fitzsimon; R Tretiak; J V Chancellor
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Prevalence of pain in general practice.

Authors:  Jan Hasselström; Jenny Liu-Palmgren; Görel Rasjö-Wrååk
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.931

8.  Large differences in cost of illness and wellbeing between patients with fibromyalgia, chronic low back pain, or ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  A Boonen; R van den Heuvel; A van Tubergen; M Goossens; J L Severens; D van der Heijde; S van der Linden
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-07-22       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 9.  Musculoskeletal disorders: primary and secondary interventions.

Authors:  Robert J Gatchel
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.368

10.  Epidemiology of musculoskeletal complaints and use of health services in Asturias, Spain.

Authors:  F J Ballina Garcia; R Hernandez Mejía; P Martín Lascuevas; J Fernandez Santana; A Cueto Espinar
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.641

View more
  3 in total

1.  The economic impact of chronic pain: a nationwide population-based cost-of-illness study in Portugal.

Authors:  Luís Filipe Azevedo; Altamiro Costa-Pereira; Liliane Mendonça; Cláudia Camila Dias; José M Castro-Lopes
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-11-22

Review 2.  Pharmacoeconomics and aging.

Authors:  Silvia Bustacchini; Andrea Corsonello; Graziano Onder; Enrico Eugenio Guffanti; Flavio Marchegiani; Angela Marie Abbatecola; Fabrizia Lattanzio
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Participation in Low Back Pain Management: It Is Time for the To-Be Scenarios in Digital Public Health.

Authors:  Michela Franchini; Massimiliano Salvatori; Francesca Denoth; Sabrina Molinaro; Stefania Pieroni
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 4.614

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.