Literature DB >> 20136171

Pharmacoeconomics and aging.

Silvia Bustacchini1, Andrea Corsonello, Graziano Onder, Enrico Eugenio Guffanti, Flavio Marchegiani, Angela Marie Abbatecola, Fabrizia Lattanzio.   

Abstract

The aging of the general population in industrialized countries has brought to public attention the increasing incidence of age-related clinical conditions, because the long-term impact of diseases on functional status and on costs are greater in older people than in any other age group. With the aging of the population, it is becoming increasingly important to quantify the burden of illness in the elderly; this will be vital not only in planning for the necessary health services that will be required in coming years, but also in order to measure the benefit to be expected from interventions to prevent disability in older people. The management of multiple and chronic disorders has become a more important issue for healthcare authorities because of increasing requests for medical assistance and healthcare interventions. Among these, pharmacological treatments and drug utilization in older people are pressing issues for healthcare managers and politicians; indeed, a relatively small proportion of the population accounts for a substantial part of public drug costs. Two key sources of pressure are well known: the growing number of elderly persons, who are the highest per-capita users of medicines, and the introduction of new, often more expensive, medicines. On the other hand, the development of strategies for controlling costs, while providing the elderly with equitable access to needed pharmaceuticals, should be based on an evaluation of the economic impact of pharmacological care in older people, taking into account the burden of illness, drug utilization data, drug technology assessment evidence and results. Furthermore, there are major factors affecting pharmacological care in older people: for example inappropriate prescribing, lack of adherence and compliance, and the burden of adverse drug events. The assessment of these factors should be considered a priority in pharmacoeconomic evaluations in the aging population, and the most relevant evidence will be reviewed in this paper with examples referring to particular settings or conditions and diseases, such as the presence of cardiovascular risk factors, diabetes and chronic pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20136171     DOI: 10.2165/11534680-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs Aging        ISSN: 1170-229X            Impact factor:   3.923


  103 in total

1.  Pharmaceutical expenditure, total health-care expenditure and GDP.

Authors:  Jesús Clemente; Carmen Marcuello; Antonio Montañés
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Randomised double-blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. The Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) Trial Investigators.

Authors:  J A Staessen; R Fagard; L Thijs; H Celis; G G Arabidze; W H Birkenhäger; C J Bulpitt; P W de Leeuw; C T Dollery; A E Fletcher; F Forette; G Leonetti; C Nachev; E T O'Brien; J Rosenfeld; J L Rodicio; J Tuomilehto; A Zanchetti
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-09-13       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Cost-effectiveness of cholesterol-lowering therapy with pravastatin in patients with previous acute coronary syndromes aged 65 to 74 years compared with younger patients: results from the LIPID study.

Authors:  Andrew M Tonkin; Simon Eckermann; Harvey White; Denis Friedlander; Paul Glasziou; Paul Magnus; Adrienne Kirby; Sarah Mulray; Mary Denton; Michele Sallaberger; David Hunt; John Simes
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension. Final results of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). SHEP Cooperative Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-06-26       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Health care utilisation among individuals reporting long-term pain: an epidemiological study based on Danish National Health Surveys.

Authors:  Jørgen Eriksen; Per Sjøgren; Ola Ekholm; Niels K Rasmussen
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.931

Review 6.  Treatment of hypertension in the elderly.

Authors:  Warren J Elliott; Henry R Black
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb

7.  Impact of inappropriate drug use on health services utilization among representative older community-dwelling residents.

Authors:  Gerda G Fillenbaum; Joseph T Hanlon; Lawrence R Landerman; Margaret B Artz; Heidi O'Connor; Bryan Dowd; Cynthia R Gross; Chad Boult; Judith Garrard; Kenneth E Schmader
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Pharmacother       Date:  2004-06

8.  Medication errors in elderly people: contributing factors and future perspectives.

Authors:  Daniela Fialová; Graziano Onder
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  The relationship between number of drugs and potential drug-drug interactions in the elderly: a study of over 600,000 elderly patients from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register.

Authors:  Kristina Johnell; Inga Klarin
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 10.  Pharmaceutical policies: effects of cap and co-payment on rational drug use.

Authors:  A Austvoll-Dahlgren; M Aaserud; G Vist; C Ramsay; A D Oxman; H Sturm; J P Kösters; A Vernby
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Probing pharmacists' interventions in Long-Term Care: a systematic review.

Authors:  João R Gonçalves; Isabel Ramalhinho; Betsy L Sleath; Manuel J Lopes; Afonso M Cavaco
Journal:  Eur Geriatr Med       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 1.710

Review 2.  Adverse drug events as a cause of hospitalization in older adults.

Authors:  Fabio Salvi; Annalisa Marchetti; Federica D'Angelo; Massimo Boemi; Fabrizia Lattanzio; Antonio Cherubini
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.606

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.