Literature DB >> 17216594

A repeated measures concordance correlation coefficient.

Tonya S King1, Vernon M Chinchilli, Josep L Carrasco.   

Abstract

The concordance correlation coefficient is commonly used to assess agreement between two raters or two methods of measuring a response when the data are measured on a continuous scale. However, the situation may arise in which repeated measurements are taken for each rater or method, e.g. longitudinal studies in clinical trials or bioassay data with subsamples. This paper proposes a coefficient for measuring agreement between two raters or two methods of measuring a response in the presence of repeated measurements. We illustrate the methodology with examples comparing (1) 1-hr versus 2-hr blood draws for measuring cortisol in an asthma clinical trial and (2) two measurements of percentage body fat, from skinfold calipers and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17216594     DOI: 10.1002/sim.2778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  23 in total

1.  Computerized method for evaluating diagnostic image quality of calcified plaque images in cardiac CT: validation on a physical dynamic cardiac phantom.

Authors:  Martin King; Zachary Rodgers; Maryellen L Giger; Dianna M E Bardo; Amit R Patel
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Methods for evaluating the agreement between diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Charity J Morgan; Inmaculada Aban
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Shared velocity encoding: a method to improve the temporal resolution of phase-contrast velocity measurements.

Authors:  Hung-Yu Lin; Jacob A Bender; Yu Ding; Yiu-Cho Chung; Alice M Hinton; Michael L Pennell; Kevin K Whitehead; Subha V Raman; Orlando P Simonetti
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Similar performance of Brasfield and Wisconsin scoring systems in young children with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Robert H Cleveland; Gregory S Sawicki; Catherine Stamoulis
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-05-29

5.  Evaluation of Agreement between Measurement Methods from Data with Matched Repeated Measurements via the Coefficient of Individual Agreement.

Authors:  Michael Haber; Jingjing Gao; Huiman X Barnhart
Journal:  J Data Sci       Date:  2010-07-01

6.  Can the height-independent Pottel eGFR equation be used as a screening tool for chronic kidney disease in children?

Authors:  Vandréa De Souza; Hans Pottel; Liesbeth Hoste; Olga Dolomanova; Regine Cartier; Luciano Selistre; Bruno Ranchin; Aoumeur Hadj-Aïssa; Sandrine Lemoine; Pierre Cochat; Laurence Dubourg
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.183

7.  Consideration of optimal time window for Pittsburgh compound B PET summed uptake measurements.

Authors:  Rebecca L McNamee; Seong-Hwan Yee; Julie C Price; William E Klunk; Bedda Rosario; Lisa Weissfeld; Scott Ziolko; Michael Berginc; Brian Lopresti; Steven Dekosky; Chester A Mathis
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  On Inference for Kendall's τ within a Longitudinal Data Setting.

Authors:  Yan Ma
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 1.404

9.  Brasfield and Wisconsin scoring systems have equal value as outcome assessment tools of cystic fibrosis lung disease.

Authors:  Robert H Cleveland; Catherine Stamoulis; Gregory Sawicki; Emma Kelliher; Evan J Zucker; Christopher Wood; David Zurakowski; Edward Lee
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-12-27

10.  Transcranial Evoked Potentials Can Be Reliably Recorded with Active Electrodes.

Authors:  Marco Mancuso; Valerio Sveva; Alessandro Cruciani; Katlyn Brown; Jaime Ibáñez; Vishal Rawji; Elias Casula; Isabella Premoli; Sasha D'Ambrosio; John Rothwell; Lorenzo Rocchi
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-01-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.