BACKGROUND: The Advanced Trauma Life Support course advocates the liberal use of chest X-ray (CXR) during the initial evaluation of trauma patients. We reviewed CXR performed in the trauma resuscitation room (TR) to determine its usefulness. METHODS: A retrospective, registry-based review was conducted and included 1,000 consecutive trauma patients who underwent CXR in the TR at a Level I trauma center during a 7-month period. RESULTS: Patients receiving CXR comprised 91.5% of all patients evaluated in the TR during the study period. CXR followed by chest computed tomography (CCT) was performed in 820 (82.0%) patients. Subsequent CCT identified missed findings in 235 (35.6%) of the 660 patients with an initial negative CXR who went on to receive CCT. CXR alone was performed in 127 (26.1%) of the 487 patients who were stable, not intubated, and had a normal chest physical examination (CPE). Seven patients (5.5%) in this group had potentially significant findings but none required intervention beyond physiotherapy or antibiotics. Three hundred and sixty (73.9%) of the 487 patients who were hemodynamically stable with a normal CPE underwent both CXR and CCT. Fifty-four patients (15%) in this group had findings of significance, and two (0.6%) required intervention. One patient received bilateral chest tubes for large pre-existing pleural effusions found on CXR and CCT; another patient undergoing general anesthesia required a chest tube for a pneumothorax found only on CCT. CONCLUSION: In stable trauma patients with a normal CPE, CXR appears to be unnecessary in their initial evaluation. CXR should be relegated to a role similar to cervical spine and pelvis radiographs in the initial evaluation of hemodynamically stable trauma patients with a normal physical examination, and should be limited to use only for clear clinical indications.
BACKGROUND: The Advanced Trauma Life Support course advocates the liberal use of chest X-ray (CXR) during the initial evaluation of traumapatients. We reviewed CXR performed in the trauma resuscitation room (TR) to determine its usefulness. METHODS: A retrospective, registry-based review was conducted and included 1,000 consecutive traumapatients who underwent CXR in the TR at a Level I trauma center during a 7-month period. RESULTS:Patients receiving CXR comprised 91.5% of all patients evaluated in the TR during the study period. CXR followed by chest computed tomography (CCT) was performed in 820 (82.0%) patients. Subsequent CCT identified missed findings in 235 (35.6%) of the 660 patients with an initial negative CXR who went on to receive CCT. CXR alone was performed in 127 (26.1%) of the 487 patients who were stable, not intubated, and had a normal chest physical examination (CPE). Seven patients (5.5%) in this group had potentially significant findings but none required intervention beyond physiotherapy or antibiotics. Three hundred and sixty (73.9%) of the 487 patients who were hemodynamically stable with a normal CPE underwent both CXR and CCT. Fifty-four patients (15%) in this group had findings of significance, and two (0.6%) required intervention. One patient received bilateral chest tubes for large pre-existing pleural effusions found on CXR and CCT; another patient undergoing general anesthesia required a chest tube for a pneumothorax found only on CCT. CONCLUSION: In stable traumapatients with a normal CPE, CXR appears to be unnecessary in their initial evaluation. CXR should be relegated to a role similar to cervical spine and pelvis radiographs in the initial evaluation of hemodynamically stable traumapatients with a normal physical examination, and should be limited to use only for clear clinical indications.
Authors: T Alam Khan; Y Jamil Khattak; M Awais; A Alam Khan; Y Husen; N Nadeem; A Rehman Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 3.693
Authors: Monique Brink; Jaap Deunk; Helena M Dekker; Michael J R Edwards; Digna R Kool; Arie B van Vugt; Cornelis van Kuijk; Johan G Blickman Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2009-09-17 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: G F Giannakopoulos; T P Saltzherr; L F M Beenen; G J Streekstra; J B Reitsma; F W Bloemers; J C Goslings; F C Bakker Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2016-09-29 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Kristina Ziegler; James M Feeney; Colleen Desai; David Sharpio; Wiiliam T Marshall; Michael Twohig Journal: J Trauma Manag Outcomes Date: 2013-05-09
Authors: Peter Andrawes; Antonio I Picon; Masood A Shariff; Basem Azab; Wolf von Waagner; Seleshi Demissie; Charles Fasanya Journal: Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Date: 2017-09-14