Literature DB >> 17214569

Expectancy induces dynamic modulation of corticospinal excitability.

Gijs van Elswijk1, Bert U Kleine, Sebastiaan Overeem, Dick F Stegeman.   

Abstract

Behavioral studies using motor preparation paradigms have revealed that increased expectancy of a response signal shortens reaction times (RTs). Neurophysiological data suggest that in such paradigms, not only RT but also neuronal activity in the motor structures involved is modulated by expectancy of behaviorally relevant events. Here, we directly tested whether expectancy of a response signal modulates excitability of the corticospinal system used in the subsequent movement. We combined single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the primary motor cortex with a simple RT task with variable preparatory delays. We found that, in line with typical behavioral observations, the subjects' RTs decreased with increasing response signal expectancy. TMS results revealed a modulation of corticospinal excitability in correspondence with response signal expectancy. Besides an increased excitability over the time-course of the preparatory delay, corticospinal excitability transiently increased whenever a response signal was expected. Paired-pulse TMS showed that this modulation is unlikely to be mediated by excitability changes in interneuronal inhibitory or facilitatory networks in the primary motor cortex. Changes in corticospinal synchronization or other mechanisms involving spinal circuits are candidates mediating the modulation of corticospinal excitability by expectancy.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17214569     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.1.121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  35 in total

Review 1.  Getting ready to move: transmitted information in the corticospinal pathway during preparation for movement.

Authors:  Oren Cohen; Efrat Sherman; Nofya Zinger; Steve Perlmutter; Yifat Prut
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 2.  Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning.

Authors:  Gabriele Wulf; Rebecca Lewthwaite
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

3.  Anticipatory changes in human motoneuron discharge patterns during motor preparation.

Authors:  Yann Duclos; Annie Schmied; Boris Burle; Henri Burnet; Christiane Rossi-Durand
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Reduced intracortical inhibition during the foreperiod of a warned reaction time task.

Authors:  Craig Sinclair; Geoffrey R Hammond
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Excitatory and inhibitory processes in primary motor cortex during the foreperiod of a warned reaction time task are unrelated to response expectancy.

Authors:  Craig Sinclair; Geoffrey R Hammond
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Role of corticospinal suppression during motor preparation.

Authors:  Julie Duque; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Decisions in changing conditions: the urgency-gating model.

Authors:  Paul Cisek; Geneviève Aude Puskas; Stephany El-Murr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Having a goal to stop action is associated with advance control of specific motor representations.

Authors:  Michael P Claffey; Sarah Sheldon; Cathy M Stinear; Frederick Verbruggen; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Predictive Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability and Implicit Encoding of Movement Probability in Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Lucile Dupin; Loïc Carment; Laura Guedj; Macarena Cuenca; Marie-Odile Krebs; Marc A Maier; Isabelle Amado; Påvel G Lindberg
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 9.306

10.  Surround inhibition is modulated by task difficulty.

Authors:  S Beck; M Hallett
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.