Mark Luscombe1, Ben Owens. 1. The Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK. markluscombe@doctors.org.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To gather data on the ages and weights of paediatric patients between 1 and 10 years of age, and to compare these data with the current weight estimation formula weight(kg) = 2(age+4). If a significant difference was found, the data would be used to derive a more accurate formula. DESIGN: Retrospective study using data collected from paediatric attendances at an emergency department (ED). SETTING: A large ED in a major UK city, treating both children and adults. PATIENTS: 17 244 children aged 1-10 years, attending the ED between June and December 2005. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Weight difference between the measured weight and the expected weight, the latter given by weight = 2(age+4). RESULTS: The weights of seriously ill children were recorded in only 41.5% of cases, necessitating a weight estimate in the remainder. The formula weight = 2(age+4) underestimated children's weights by a mean of 18.8% (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 18.42% to 19.18%). Using linear regression and analysis of each individual age group, ten new formulas were tested. Of these formulas, weight(kg) = 3(age)+7 proved the most accurate with a mean underestimate of just 2.48% (95% CI 2.17% to 2.79%). CONCLUSIONS: Weight estimation remains of paramount importance in paediatric resuscitation. This study shows that the current estimation formula provides a significant underestimate of children's weights. When used to calculate drug and fluid dosages, this may lead to the under-resuscitation of a critically ill child. The formula weight(kg) = 3(age)+7 provided a safe and more accurate estimate of the weight of today's child.
OBJECTIVES: To gather data on the ages and weights of paediatric patients between 1 and 10 years of age, and to compare these data with the current weight estimation formula weight(kg) = 2(age+4). If a significant difference was found, the data would be used to derive a more accurate formula. DESIGN: Retrospective study using data collected from paediatric attendances at an emergency department (ED). SETTING: A large ED in a major UK city, treating both children and adults. PATIENTS: 17 244 children aged 1-10 years, attending the ED between June and December 2005. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Weight difference between the measured weight and the expected weight, the latter given by weight = 2(age+4). RESULTS: The weights of seriously ill children were recorded in only 41.5% of cases, necessitating a weight estimate in the remainder. The formula weight = 2(age+4) underestimated children's weights by a mean of 18.8% (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 18.42% to 19.18%). Using linear regression and analysis of each individual age group, ten new formulas were tested. Of these formulas, weight(kg) = 3(age)+7 proved the most accurate with a mean underestimate of just 2.48% (95% CI 2.17% to 2.79%). CONCLUSIONS: Weight estimation remains of paramount importance in paediatric resuscitation. This study shows that the current estimation formula provides a significant underestimate of children's weights. When used to calculate drug and fluid dosages, this may lead to the under-resuscitation of a critically ill child. The formula weight(kg) = 3(age)+7 provided a safe and more accurate estimate of the weight of today's child.
Authors: R C Luten; R L Wears; J Broselow; A Zaritsky; T M Barnett; T Lee; A Bailey; R Vally; R Brown; B Rosenthal Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 1992-08 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Susan M Abdel-Rahman; Nichole Ahlers; Anne Holmes; Krista Wright; Ann Harris; Jaylene Weigel; Talita Hill; Kim Baird; Marla Michaels; Gregory L Kearns Journal: J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther Date: 2013-04
Authors: Sven C van Dijkman; Nico C B de Jager; Willem M Rauwé; Meindert Danhof; Oscar Della Pasqua Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Yeyi Zhu; Ladia M Hernandez; Yongquan Dong; John H Himes; Laura E Caulfield; Jean M Kerver; Lenore Arab; Paula Voss; Steven Hirschfeld; Michele R Forman Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2018-10-18 Impact factor: 4.022