Literature DB >> 17212380

Prevalence-dependent diagnostic accuracy measures.

Jialiang Li1, Jason P Fine, Nasia Safdar.   

Abstract

We study prevalence-dependent diagnostic accuracy measures, specifically, positive and negative predictive values. These measures permit an assessment of the clinical utility of diagnostic tests across populations with different disease prevalences. In many cases, prevalence may not be known with certainty and the evaluation of the diagnostic tests must account for this uncertainty. A sensitivity analysis may be desired across a prevalence continuum defining low to high-risk populations. For this scenario, simultaneous inference about the predictive values across a range of prevalences is proposed. For situations where a non-point prior distribution on prevalence is specified, we suggest inferences based on averaging the accuracy measures with respect to the prior, leading to simple numerical summaries. The methods are illustrated in a meta-analysis of diagnostic tests for intravascular device-related bloodstream infection, where the prevalence may vary widely both within and across populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17212380     DOI: 10.1002/sim.2812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  9 in total

1.  At risk or not at risk? A meta-analysis of the prognostic accuracy of psychometric interviews for psychosis prediction.

Authors:  Paolo Fusar-Poli; Marco Cappucciati; Grazia Rutigliano; Frauke Schultze-Lutter; Ilaria Bonoldi; Stefan Borgwardt; Anita Riecher-Rössler; Jean Addington; Diana Perkins; Scott W Woods; Thomas H McGlashan; Jimmy Lee; Joachim Klosterkötter; Alison R Yung; Philip McGuire
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 49.548

2.  Sample size for positive and negative predictive value in diagnostic research using case-control designs.

Authors:  David M Steinberg; Jason Fine; Rick Chappell
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 3.  PGS-FISH in reproductive medicine and perspective directions for improvement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sandra Zamora; Ana Clavero; M Carmen Gonzalvo; Juan de Dios Luna Del Castillo; Jose Antonio Roldán-Nofuentes; Juan Mozas; Jose Antonio Castilla
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  A Bayesian Hierarchical Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic Model for Network Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Tests.

Authors:  Qinshu Lian; James S Hodges; Haitao Chu
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 5.033

5.  A hybrid Bayesian hierarchical model combining cohort and case-control studies for meta-analysis of diagnostic tests: Accounting for partial verification bias.

Authors:  Xiaoye Ma; Yong Chen; Stephen R Cole; Haitao Chu
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2014-05-26       Impact factor: 3.021

6.  Prognostic accuracy and clinical utility of psychometric instruments for individuals at clinical high-risk of psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dominic Oliver; Maite Arribas; Joaquim Radua; Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo; Andrea De Micheli; Giulia Spada; Martina Maria Mensi; Magdalena Kotlicka-Antczak; Renato Borgatti; Marco Solmi; Jae Il Shin; Scott W Woods; Jean Addington; Philip McGuire; Paolo Fusar-Poli
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 15.992

7.  Reassessing the interpretation of oxidation-reduction potential in male infertility.

Authors:  Fabien Joao; Cyntia Duval; Marie-Claire Bélanger; Julie Lamoureux; Cheng Wei Xiao; Senem Ates; Moncef Benkhalifa; Pierre Miron
Journal:  Reprod Fertil       Date:  2022-03-18

8.  Thyroseq v3, Afirma GSC, and microRNA Panels Versus Previous Molecular Tests in the Preoperative Diagnosis of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Cristina Alina Silaghi; Vera Lozovanu; Carmen Emanuela Georgescu; Raluca Diana Georgescu; Sergiu Susman; Bogdana Adriana Năsui; Anca Dobrean; Horatiu Silaghi
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 5.555

9.  Diagnostic Characteristics of Serological-Based COVID-19 Testing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura; Thomas R McCarty; Igor Braga Ribeiro; Mateus Pereira Funari; Pedro Victor Aniz Gomes de Oliveira; Antonio Afonso de Miranda Neto; Epifânio Silvino do Monte Júnior; Francisco Tustumi; Wanderley Marques Bernardo; Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura; Christopher C Thompson
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 2.365

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.