Martin J Citardi1, Pete S Batra. 1. Section of Nasal and Sinus Disorders, Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA. citardm@ccf.org
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The present review discusses the rationale and indications for image-guided surgery through a critical discussion of registration concepts as well as clinical reports. RECENT FINDINGS: The surgical navigation accuracy achieved by commercially available image-guided surgery systems is best reported as target registration error. Clinically achievable target registration error is probably in the 1.5-2.0 mm range. Dry lab studies of registration serve to highlight the principles of registration, the process through which image-guided surgery systems calculate the one-to-one mapping relationship between the preoperative imaging data and the intraoperative surgical volume. Reports on image-guided surgery have highlighted its usefulness in primary and revision endoscopic sinus surgery, osteoplastic frontal sinusotomy, transsphenoidal hypophysectomy, endoscopic cerebrospinal fluid leak repair and endoscopic pterygomaxillary fossa biopsy. Both three-dimensional computed tomography angiography and computed tomography-magnetic resonance fusion images have been incorporated into IGS for advanced minimally invasive endoscopic skull base procedures. The American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery policy statement accurately summarizes the current consensus for image-guided surgery applications. SUMMARY: Image-guided surgery has emerged as an important technology, which both general otolaryngologists and subspecialty rhinologists can employ for a wide variety of procedures.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The present review discusses the rationale and indications for image-guided surgery through a critical discussion of registration concepts as well as clinical reports. RECENT FINDINGS: The surgical navigation accuracy achieved by commercially available image-guided surgery systems is best reported as target registration error. Clinically achievable target registration error is probably in the 1.5-2.0 mm range. Dry lab studies of registration serve to highlight the principles of registration, the process through which image-guided surgery systems calculate the one-to-one mapping relationship between the preoperative imaging data and the intraoperative surgical volume. Reports on image-guided surgery have highlighted its usefulness in primary and revision endoscopic sinus surgery, osteoplastic frontal sinusotomy, transsphenoidal hypophysectomy, endoscopic cerebrospinal fluid leak repair and endoscopic pterygomaxillary fossa biopsy. Both three-dimensional computed tomography angiography and computed tomography-magnetic resonance fusion images have been incorporated into IGS for advanced minimally invasive endoscopic skull base procedures. The American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery policy statement accurately summarizes the current consensus for image-guided surgery applications. SUMMARY: Image-guided surgery has emerged as an important technology, which both general otolaryngologists and subspecialty rhinologists can employ for a wide variety of procedures.
Authors: M Helbig; K Krysztoforski; J Kucharski; M Popek; T Kroll; S Helbig; A May; W Gstoettner; J Kozak Journal: HNO Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 1.284
Authors: Aris I Giotakis; Florian Kral; Wolfgang Freysinger; Stefan Markart; Herbert Riechelmann Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2019-03-06 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Stella Lee; Gary L Gallia; Douglas D Reh; Sebastian Schafer; Ali Uneri; Daniel J Mirota; Sajendra Nithiananthan; Yoshito Otake; J Webster Stayman; Wojciech Zbijewski; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2012-08-08 Impact factor: 3.325