Literature DB >> 17211072

XANES measurements of the rate of radiation damage to selenomethionine side chains.

James M Holton1.   

Abstract

The radiation-induced disordering of selenomethionine (SeMet) side chains represents a significant impediment to protein structure solution. Not only does the increased B-factor of these sites result in a serious drop in phasing power, but some sites decay much faster than others in the same unit cell. These radio-labile SeMet side chains decay faster than high-order diffraction spots with dose, making it difficult to detect this kind of damage by inspection of the diffraction pattern. The selenium X-ray absorbance near-edge spectrum (XANES) from samples containing SeMet was found to change significantly after application of X-ray doses of 10-100 MGy. Most notably, the sharp ;white line' feature near the canonical Se edge disappears. The change was attributed to breakage of the Cgamma-Se bond in SeMet. This spectral change was used as a probe to measure the decay rate of SeMet with X-ray dose in cryo-cooled samples. Two protein crystal types and 15 solutions containing free SeMet amino acid were examined. The damage rate was influenced by the chemical and physical condition of the sample, and the half-decaying dose for the selenium XANES signal ranged from 5 to 43 MGy. These decay rates were 34- to 3.8-fold higher than the rate at which the Se atoms interacted directly with X-ray photons, so the damage mechanism must be a secondary effect. Samples that cooled to a more crystalline state generally decayed faster than samples that cooled to an amorphous solid. The single exception was a protein crystal where a nanocrystalline cryoprotectant had a protective effect. Lowering the pH, especially with ascorbic or nitric acids, had a protective effect, and SeMet lifetime increased monotonically with decreasing sample temperature (down to 93 K). The SeMet lifetime in one protein crystal was the same as that of the free amino acid, and the longest SeMet lifetime measured was found in the other protein crystal type. This protection was found to arise from the folded structure of the protein molecule. A mechanism to explain observed decay rates involving the damaging species following the electric field lines around protein molecules is proposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17211072      PMCID: PMC2806430          DOI: 10.1107/S0909049506048898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat        ISSN: 0909-0495            Impact factor:   2.616


  40 in total

1.  Automated protein crystal structure determination using ELVES.

Authors:  James Holton; Tom Alber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-01-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Structural changes in a cryo-cooled protein crystal owing to radiation damage.

Authors:  W P Burmeister
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2000-03

3.  Structural effects of radiation damage and its potential for phasing.

Authors:  Sankaran Banumathi; Petrus H Zwart; Udupi A Ramagopal; Miroslawa Dauter; Zbigniew Dauter
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2004-05-21

4.  Towards the measurement of ideal data for macromolecular crystallography using synchrotron sources.

Authors:  J R Helliwell; S Ealick; P Doing; T Irving; M Szebenyi
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  1993-01-01

5.  Specific chemical and structural damage to proteins produced by synchrotron radiation.

Authors:  M Weik; R B Ravelli; G Kryger; S McSweeney; M L Raves; M Harel; P Gros; I Silman; J Kroon; J L Sussman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Suite of three protein crystallography beamlines with single superconducting bend magnet as the source.

Authors:  Alastair A MacDowell; Rich S Celestre; Malcolm Howells; Wayne McKinney; James Krupnick; Daniella Cambie; Edward E Domning; Robert M Duarte; Nicholas Kelez; David W Plate; Carl W Cork; Thomas N Earnest; Jeffery Dickert; George Meigs; Corie Ralston; James M Holton; Tom Alber; James M Berger; David A Agard; Howard A Padmore
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2004-10-22       Impact factor: 2.616

7.  Parameters affecting the X-ray dose absorbed by macromolecular crystals.

Authors:  James W Murray; Enrique Rudiño-Piñera; Robin Leslie Owen; Martin Grininger; Raimond B G Ravelli; Elspeth F Garman
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 2.616

8.  Ultrahigh resolution structure of a class A beta-lactamase: on the mechanism and specificity of the extended-spectrum SHV-2 enzyme.

Authors:  Michiyoshi Nukaga; Kayoko Mayama; Andrea M Hujer; Robert A Bonomo; James R Knox
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Two-wavelength MAD phasing and radiation damage: a case study.

Authors:  Ana González; Frank von Delft; Robert C Liddington; Constantina Bakolitsa
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 2.616

10.  Will reduced radiation damage occur with very small crystals?

Authors:  Colin Nave; Mark A Hill
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 2.616

View more
  19 in total

1.  Identification of patterns in diffraction intensities affected by radiation exposure.

Authors:  Dominika Borek; Zbigniew Dauter; Zbyszek Otwinowski
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 2.616

2.  Objective evaluation of radiation damage in a nucleoprotein complex.

Authors:  Zbigniew Dauter
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 7.652

3.  The cytotoxic Staphylococcus aureus PSMα3 reveals a cross-α amyloid-like fibril.

Authors:  Einav Tayeb-Fligelman; Orly Tabachnikov; Asher Moshe; Orit Goldshmidt-Tran; Michael R Sawaya; Nicolas Coquelle; Jacques-Philippe Colletier; Meytal Landau
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Radiation damage in macromolecular crystallography: what is it and why should we care?

Authors:  Elspeth F Garman
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2010-03-24

Review 5.  Selenium incorporation using recombinant techniques.

Authors:  Helen Walden
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2010-03-24

6.  Diffraction data analysis in the presence of radiation damage.

Authors:  Dominika Borek; Marcin Cymborowski; Mischa Machius; Wladek Minor; Zbyszek Otwinowski
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2010-03-24

7.  The molecular basis of inhibition of Golgi alpha-mannosidase II by mannostatin A.

Authors:  Douglas A Kuntz; Wei Zhong; Jun Guo; David R Rose; Geert-Jan Boons
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 3.164

8.  Structure of the complex between teicoplanin and a bacterial cell-wall peptide: use of a carrier-protein approach.

Authors:  Nicoleta J Economou; Isaac J Zentner; Edwin Lazo; Jean Jakoncic; Vivian Stojanoff; Stephen D Weeks; Kimberly C Grasty; Simon Cocklin; Patrick J Loll
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2013-03-14

9.  2007 annual progress report synopsis of the Center for Structures of Membrane Proteins.

Authors:  Robert M Stroud; Senyon Choe; James Holton; H Ronald Kaback; Witek Kwiatkowski; Daniel L Minor; Roland Riek; Andrej Sali; Henning Stahlberg; William Harries
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2009-01-16

10.  To scavenge or not to scavenge, that is STILL the question.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Allan; Melissa C Kander; Ian Carmichael; Elspeth F Garman
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.616

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.