Literature DB >> 17209727

Retinal image shifts, but not eye movements per se, cause alternations in awareness during binocular rivalry.

Loes C J van Dam1, Raymond van Ee.   

Abstract

Particularly promising studies on visual awareness exploit a generally used perceptual bistability phenomenon, "binocular rivalry"--in which the two eyes' images alternately dominate--because it can dissociate the visual input from the perceptual output. To successfully study awareness, it is crucial to know the extent to which eye movements alter the input. Although there is convincing evidence that perceptual alternations can occur without eye movements, the literature on their exact role is mixed. Moreover, recent work has demonstrated that eye movements, first, correlate positively with perceptual alternations in binocular rivalry, and second, often accompany covert attention shifts (that were previously thought to be purely mental). Here, we asked whether eye movements cause perceptual alternations, and if so, whether it is either the execution of the eye movement or the resulting retinal image change that causes the alternation. Subjects viewed repetitive line patterns, enabling a distinction of saccades that did produce foveal image changes from those that did not. Subjects reported binocular rivalry alternations. We found that, although a saccade is not essential to initiate percept changes, the foveal image change resulting from a (micro)saccade is a deciding factor for percept dominance. We conclude that the foveal image must change to have a saccade cause a change in awareness. This sheds new light on the interaction between spatial attention shifts and perceptual alternations.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17209727     DOI: 10.1167/6.11.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  33 in total

1.  Right parietal brain activity precedes perceptual alternation during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Juliane Britz; Michael A Pitts; Christoph M Michel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Opposing effects of attention and consciousness on afterimages.

Authors:  Jeroen J A van Boxtel; Naotsugu Tsuchiya; Christof Koch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Microsaccades drive illusory motion in the Enigma illusion.

Authors:  Xoana G Troncoso; Stephen L Macknik; Jorge Otero-Millan; Susana Martinez-Conde
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Genetic contribution to individual variation in binocular rivalry rate.

Authors:  Steven M Miller; Narelle K Hansell; Trung T Ngo; Guang B Liu; John D Pettigrew; Nicholas G Martin; Margaret J Wright
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Eye movements: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Eileen Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 6.  Unchanging visions: the effects and limitations of ocular stillness.

Authors:  Susana Martinez-Conde; Stephen L Macknik
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  The impact of microsaccades on vision: towards a unified theory of saccadic function.

Authors:  Susana Martinez-Conde; Jorge Otero-Millan; Stephen L Macknik
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  A monocular contribution to stimulus rivalry.

Authors:  Jan Brascamp; Hansem Sohn; Sang-Hun Lee; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker.

Authors:  Cheng S Qian; Jan W Brascamp
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  Nonlinear SSVEP responses are sensitive to the perceptual binding of visual hemifields during conventional 'eye' rivalry and interocular 'percept' rivalry.

Authors:  David Sutoyo; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.