Literature DB >> 17207626

Experimental evaluation of the biomechanical performances of a PMMA-based knee spacer.

Tomaso Villa1, Davide Carnelli.   

Abstract

Infection of knee prostheses is still one of the major concerns of the reliability over time of these implantable devices. The preferred treatment of this condition has turned out to be the use of a knee spacer in a two-stage reimplantation technique. The advantages of this technique associated with the use of a mobile spacer lies both in the possibility for the patient to move during the interim period, thus decreasing the risk of muscle contracture due to immobilisation, as well as in the ability to release antibiotics directly to the site of infection. The evaluation of the biomechanical properties of new mobile spacers preformed in three different sizes has been carried out subjecting the spacers to i) cyclic tests on a knee simulator for 500,000 walking cycles, ii) constraint tests in medio-lateral, antero-posterior and internal-external directions, iii) fatigue tests on the tibial tray. Particular attention was addressed to the evaluation of the mechanical resistance of the devices, to the quantity of wear debris produced during the tests and to the extent that such debris was influenced by the test parameters and geometrical dimensions of the spacers themselves. Results showed no sign of failure for any of the tested spacers, the constraint and fatigue behaviours were similar to those shown by a total knee prosthesis and the amount of debris turned out to be directly correlated to the size of the devices: in conclusion, the devices showed a good level of mechanical performance and, consequently, a sufficiently high degree of suitability for clinical use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17207626     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2006.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  9 in total

1.  Mechanical effects, antimicrobial efficacy and cytotoxicity of usnic acid as a biofilm prophylaxis in PMMA.

Authors:  Sunghwan Kim; Robert Greenleaf; Mark Carl Miller; Latha Satish; Sandeep Kathju; Garth Ehrlich; J Christopher Post; Nicholas G Sotereanos; Paul Stoodley
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 2.  Two-stage revision of septic knee prosthesis with articulating knee spacers yields better infection eradication rate than one-stage or two-stage revision with static spacers.

Authors:  C L Romanò; L Gala; N Logoluso; D Romanò; L Drago
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Do dynamic cement-on-cement knee spacers provide better function and activity during two-stage exchange?

Authors:  David J Jaekel; Judd S Day; Gregg R Klein; Harlan Levine; Javad Parvizi; Steven M Kurtz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Articulating spacers used in two-stage revision of infected hip and knee prostheses abrade with time.

Authors:  Bernd Fink; Annett Rechtenbach; Hubert Büchner; Sebastian Vogt; Michael Hahn
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Two-stage treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty: two to thirteen year experience using an articulating preformed spacer.

Authors:  Claudio Carlo Castelli; Valerio Gotti; Roberto Ferrari
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-26       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Acrylic bone cement: current concept review.

Authors:  B Magnan; M Bondi; T Maluta; E Samaila; L Schirru; C Dall'Oca
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2013-07-27

7.  Wear Performance of Calcium Carbonate-Containing Knee Spacers.

Authors:  Ulrike Mueller; Joern Reinders; Sydney Smith-Romanski; Jan Philippe Kretzer
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Evidence of MRSE on a gentamicin and vancomycin impregnated polymethyl-methacrylate (PMMA) bone cement spacer after two-stage exchange arthroplasty due to periprosthetic joint infection of the knee.

Authors:  Jan Schmolders; Gunnar T R Hischebeth; Max J Friedrich; Thomas M Randau; Matthias D Wimmer; Hendrik Kohlhof; Ernst Molitor; Sascha Gravius
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.090

9.  Loading capacity of dynamic knee spacers: a comparison between hand-moulded and COPAL spacers.

Authors:  Sook-Yee Chong; Lu Shen; Sandra Frantz
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 2.362

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.