Literature DB >> 17206564

[Prevention of bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. "The critical view of safety"].

H P Heistermann1, A Tobusch, D Palmes.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Iatrogenic injuries of the bile duct and hepatic artery represent a continuous problem after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In this observational study we report about our experiences applying the "critical view of safety", defined as unambiguous identification of the cystic duct and artery by creation of an infundibular window, in order to minimise bile duct lesions and conversion rate.
METHODS: Between July 2002 and November 2004 100 consecutive laparoscopicly started cholecystectomies were prospectively investigated. The central surgical step of dissection aimed at reaching the "critical view of safety" and its photo printing before cutting the cystic duct and artery, otherwise a conversion was carried out without exception. Primary endpoints of the study were the conversion rate, secondary endpoints the incidence of intra- and postoperative complications, operation time and histological results.
RESULTS: 53 of the 100 primary laparoscopic operated patients showed the signs of an acute cholecystitis, 44 patients offered partially multiple abdominal operations in their history. In 19 patients we performed a "therapeutic splitting". Only in 3 patients it was not possible to apply the "critical view of safety" resulting in a conversion to open cholecystectomy. The mean operation time was 81 minutes and the postoperative hospital stay ranged to 5.4 (1-18) days. Postoperatively an insufficiency of cystic duct, a navel infection, an abdominal wall haematoma, an urinary tract infection and a pneumonia occurred in one patient each. DISCUSSION: Pivotal factors leading to bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy are systematic mistakes in the surgical technique, an insufficient surgical training and human failure of the surgeon. The introduction of the "critical view of safety" represents an objective, understandable and compulsory criterion for minimising the risk of iatrogenic injuries of the bile duct and decision on conversion to open cholecystectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17206564     DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-957031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zentralbl Chir        ISSN: 0044-409X            Impact factor:   0.942


  11 in total

1.  [Intraoperative consulting. An easy addition to the surgical safety checklist for perioperative quality assurance].

Authors:  W Teichmann; S Petersen; D Thieme; W Rost; W Schwenk
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Optimal surgical technique, use of intra-operative cholangiography (IOC), and management of acute gallbladder disease: the results of a nation-wide survey in the UK and Ireland.

Authors:  P Sanjay; C Kulli; F M Polignano; I S Tait
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Intraoperative consultation as an instrument of quality management.

Authors:  Wolfgang Teichmann; Wilm Rost; Daniel Thieme; Sven Petersen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a teaching operation: comparison of outcome between residents and attending surgeons in 1,747 patients.

Authors:  René Fahrner; Matthias Turina; Valentin Neuhaus; Othmar Schöb
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  How often do surgeons obtain the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

Authors:  Dimitrios Stefanidis; Nikita Chintalapudi; Brittany Anderson-Montoya; Bindhu Oommen; Daniel Tobben; Manuel Pimentel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  A multidisciplinary approach to urinary system iatrogenic injuries.

Authors:  Vladimir Beloborodov; Vladimir Vorobev; Igor Golub; Aleksandr Frolov; Elena Kelchevskaya; Darizhab Tsoktoev; Tatyana Maksikova
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2020-12-14

7.  The educational quality of the critical view of safety in videos on youtube® versus specialized platforms: which is better? Critical view of safety in virtual resources.

Authors:  Antonio Marmolejo Chavira; Jorge Farell Rivas; Ana Paula Ruiz Funes Molina; Sergio Ayala de la Cruz; Alejandro Cruz Zárate; Alfonso Bandin Musa; Víctor José Cuevas Osorio
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Single center experiences of needle-scopic grasper assisted single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder benign disease: comparison with conventional 3-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Tae-Seok Kim; Kee-Hwan Kim; Chang-Hyeok An; Jeong-Soo Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 1.859

9.  The critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Strasberg Yes or No? An Italian Multicentre study.

Authors:  Lucia Ilaria Sgaramella; Angela Gurrado; Alessandro Pasculli; Nicola de Angelis; Riccardo Memeo; Francesco Paolo Prete; Stefano Berti; Graziano Ceccarelli; Marco Rigamonti; Francesco Giuseppe Aldo Badessi; Nicola Solari; Marco Milone; Fausto Catena; Stefano Scabini; Francesco Vittore; Gennaro Perrone; Carlo de Werra; Ferdinando Cafiero; Mario Testini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Evaluation of the usefulness of the SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program from the viewpoint of the European surgeon.

Authors:  Paweł Bogacki; Jan Krzak; Katarzyna Gotfryd-Bugajska; Mirosław Szura
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 1.195

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.