BACKGROUND: Body Mass Index (BMI) is often used as a surrogate estimate of body fat in epidemiological studies. This study explores the association between BMI, body fat and body fat distribution assessed by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) in younger children. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 246 children (138 boys and 108 girls) aged 8-11 years. DXA was used to quantify abdominal fat mass (AFM), total body fat (TBF) and also total body fat as percentage of total body mass (BF%). Body fat distribution was calculated as AFM/TBF. RESULTS: We found close correlations between BMI vs. TBF, BF% and AFM (r = 0.94, r = 0.92 and r = 0.93) for boys and (r = 0.95, r = 0.92 and r = 0.95) for girls, respectively (P<0.05 for all r-values). However, significantly lower correlation (P<0.001 for difference between the r-values) existed for body fat distribution (r = 0.64 for boys and 0.73 for girls). CONCLUSION: Percentage body fat, TBF and AFM were all closely associated with BMI, suggesting that BMI serves as a good surrogate marker for obesity in population studies. However, a significantly lower correlation existed for BMI vs. body fat distribution, which may be a limitation when BMI is used to study cardiovascular risk factors in epidemiological studies.
BACKGROUND: Body Mass Index (BMI) is often used as a surrogate estimate of body fat in epidemiological studies. This study explores the association between BMI, body fat and body fat distribution assessed by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) in younger children. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 246 children (138 boys and 108 girls) aged 8-11 years. DXA was used to quantify abdominal fat mass (AFM), total body fat (TBF) and also total body fat as percentage of total body mass (BF%). Body fat distribution was calculated as AFM/TBF. RESULTS: We found close correlations between BMI vs. TBF, BF% and AFM (r = 0.94, r = 0.92 and r = 0.93) for boys and (r = 0.95, r = 0.92 and r = 0.95) for girls, respectively (P<0.05 for all r-values). However, significantly lower correlation (P<0.001 for difference between the r-values) existed for body fat distribution (r = 0.64 for boys and 0.73 for girls). CONCLUSION: Percentage body fat, TBF and AFM were all closely associated with BMI, suggesting that BMI serves as a good surrogate marker for obesity in population studies. However, a significantly lower correlation existed for BMI vs. body fat distribution, which may be a limitation when BMI is used to study cardiovascular risk factors in epidemiological studies.
Authors: Katherine A Bell; Carol L Wagner; Wei Perng; Henry A Feldman; Roman J Shypailo; Mandy B Belfort Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Kelsey L McAlister; Jennifer Zink; Daniel Chu; Britni R Belcher; Genevieve F Dunton Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-27 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Caroline E Boeke; Emily Oken; Ken P Kleinman; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Elsie M Taveras; Matthew W Gillman Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2013-06-24 Impact factor: 2.125
Authors: Francesca Solmi; Cynthia M Bulik; Bianca L De Stavola; Christina Dalman; Golam M Khandaker; Glyn Lewis Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2020-08-02 Impact factor: 7.217