Literature DB >> 15905807

Maximum a posteriori bayesian estimation of mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics in renal transplant recipients at different postgrafting periods.

Aurélie Prémaud1, Yannick Le Meur, Jean Debord, Jean-Christophe Szelag, Annick Rousseau, Guillaume Hoizey, Olivier Toupance, Pierre Marquet.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop maximum a posteriori probability (MAP) Bayesian estimators of mycophenolic acid (MPA) pharmacokinetics (PK) capable of accurately estimating the MPA interdose AUC in renal transplant patients using a limited number of blood samples. The individual MPA plasma concentration-time profiles of 44 adult kidney transplant recipients were retrospectively studied: in 24 de novo transplant patients, 2 profiles were obtained on day 7 and day 30 after transplantation, and in 20 stable transplant patients, 1 profile was obtained in the stable period (>3 months). MPA was assayed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Concentration data were fitted using previously designed PK models, including 1 or 2Gamma-distribution to describe the absorption rate. MAP-Bayesian estimations were performed using an in-house program. For each posttransplantation period, the limited sampling strategies (LSS) providing either the best determination coefficient or the lowest bias for AUC estimates with respect to trapezoidal AUCs were selected and compared with respect to the percentage of "clinically acceptable" AUC estimates (ie, within -20% to +20% of the true value) they yielded. A common LSS (blood samples collected at T20 min, T1 h, and T3 h postdosing), convenient for all 3 periods, was also selected and validated: bias (RMSE%) values were -5.7% (20.5%), -8.2% (14.4%), and +0.4% (12.0%) on D7, D30, and for >M3 with respect to the reference values obtained using the trapezoidal rule, respectively. For the first time, MAP-Bayesian estimators of MPA systemic exposure at different posttransplantation periods (early as well as later periods) could be designed. They have since been used for MPA dose adaptation in concentration-controlled studies as well as for MPA therapeutic drug monitoring in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15905807     DOI: 10.1097/01.ftd.0000162231.90811.38

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Drug Monit        ISSN: 0163-4356            Impact factor:   3.681


  29 in total

1.  Large scale analysis of routine dose adjustments of mycophenolate mofetil based on global exposure in renal transplant patients.

Authors:  Franck Saint-Marcoux; Soizic Vandierdonck; Aurélie Prémaud; Jean Debord; Annick Rousseau; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.681

Review 2.  Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mycophenolate in solid organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  Christine E Staatz; Susan E Tett
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Pharmacokinetic optimization of immunosuppressive therapy in thoracic transplantation: part II.

Authors:  Caroline Monchaud; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Pharmacokinetic optimization of immunosuppressive therapy in thoracic transplantation: part I.

Authors:  Caroline Monchaud; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Comment on "Population Pharmacokinetics of Mycophenolic Acid: An Update".

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Woillard; Jean Debord; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Time-dependent clearance of mycophenolic acid in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Reinier M van Hest; Teun van Gelder; René Bouw; Timothy Goggin; Robert Gordon; Richard D Mamelok; Ron A Mathot
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 7.  How accurate and precise are limited sampling strategies in estimating exposure to mycophenolic acid in people with autoimmune disease?

Authors:  Azrin N Abd Rahman; Susan E Tett; Christine E Staatz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Tacrolimus population pharmacokinetic-pharmacogenetic analysis and Bayesian estimation in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Khaled Benkali; Aurelie Prémaud; Nicolas Picard; Jean-Philippe Rérolle; Olivier Toupance; Guillaume Hoizey; Alain Turcant; Florence Villemain; Yannick Le Meur; Pierre Marquet; Annick Rousseau
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Statistical tools for dose individualization of mycophenolic acid and tacrolimus co-administered during the first month after renal transplantation.

Authors:  Flora T Musuamba; Michel Mourad; Vincent Haufroid; Martine De Meyer; Arnaud Capron; Isabelle K Delattre; Roger K Verbeeck; Pierre Wallemacq
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Mycophenolic acid formulations in adult renal transplantation - update on efficacy and tolerability.

Authors:  Déla Golshayan; M Pascual; Bruno Vogt
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.