BACKGROUND: Providers play a vital role in the successful recruitment of underrepresented patients to cancer clinical trials because they often introduce the opportunity of clinical trials. The purpose of the current systematic review was to describe provider-related factors influencing recruitment of underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials. METHODS: To find original studies on the recruitment of underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials, electronic databases from January 1966 to December 2005 were searched; hand-searched titles in 34 journals from January 2003 to January 2006; and reference lists were examined of eligible articles. Title and abstract reviews were conducted to identify relevant studies. Potential articles were then abstracted using a structured instrument and a serial review process by 2 investigators. RESULTS: Eighteen studies were eligible for review: 13 targeted healthcare providers, 3 targeted patients/participants, and 2 targeted both providers and patients. The study designs included randomized controlled trial, concurrent controlled trial, case-control, descriptive, and qualitative. A lack of available protocols and/or a lack of provider awareness about clinical trials prevented providers from discussing the opportunity of clinical trials in 2 studies. In 14 studies, patient accrual was affected by provider attitudinal barriers relating to patient adherence to the study protocol, patient mistrust of research, patient costs, data collection costs, and/or patient eligibility. Providers' communication methods were barriers in 5 studies and promoters in 1 study. CONCLUSIONS: A heterogeneous body of evidence suggests that several provider-related factors influence recruitment of underrepresented groups to clinical trials. Future recruitment efforts should address these factors. (c) 2007 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: Providers play a vital role in the successful recruitment of underrepresented patients to cancer clinical trials because they often introduce the opportunity of clinical trials. The purpose of the current systematic review was to describe provider-related factors influencing recruitment of underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials. METHODS: To find original studies on the recruitment of underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials, electronic databases from January 1966 to December 2005 were searched; hand-searched titles in 34 journals from January 2003 to January 2006; and reference lists were examined of eligible articles. Title and abstract reviews were conducted to identify relevant studies. Potential articles were then abstracted using a structured instrument and a serial review process by 2 investigators. RESULTS: Eighteen studies were eligible for review: 13 targeted healthcare providers, 3 targeted patients/participants, and 2 targeted both providers and patients. The study designs included randomized controlled trial, concurrent controlled trial, case-control, descriptive, and qualitative. A lack of available protocols and/or a lack of provider awareness about clinical trials prevented providers from discussing the opportunity of clinical trials in 2 studies. In 14 studies, patient accrual was affected by provider attitudinal barriers relating to patient adherence to the study protocol, patient mistrust of research, patient costs, data collection costs, and/or patient eligibility. Providers' communication methods were barriers in 5 studies and promoters in 1 study. CONCLUSIONS: A heterogeneous body of evidence suggests that several provider-related factors influence recruitment of underrepresented groups to clinical trials. Future recruitment efforts should address these factors. (c) 2007 American Cancer Society.
Authors: Soumya J Niranjan; Raegan W Durant; Jennifer A Wenzel; Elise D Cook; Mona N Fouad; Selwyn M Vickers; Badrinath R Konety; Sarah B Rutland; Zachary R Simoni; Michelle Y Martin Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Margo Michaels; Elisa S Weiss; John A Guidry; Natasha Blakeney; Liz Swords; Brian Gibbs; Samantha Yeun; Bruce Rytkonen; Robert Goodman; S Lisbeth Jarama; Amanda L Greene; Shilpa Patel Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Russell K Schutt; Lidia Schapira; Jennifer Maniates; Jessica Santiccioli; Silas Henlon; Judyann Bigby Journal: J Community Health Date: 2010-08
Authors: Christina M Getrich; Andrew L Sussman; Kimberly Campbell-Voytal; Janice Y Tsoh; Robert L Williams; Anthony E Brown; Michael B Potter; William Spears; Nancy Weller; John Pascoe; Kendra Schwartz; Anne Victoria Neale Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2013 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Sandi L Pruitt; Hong Zhu; Daniel F Heitjan; Asal Rahimi; Bhumika Maddineni; Anna Tavakkoli; Ethan A Halm; David E Gerber; Danyi Xiong; Caitlin C Murphy Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2021-02-23 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Marvella E Ford; Laura A Siminoff; Elisabeth Pickelsimer; Arch G Mainous; Daniel W Smith; Vanessa A Diaz; Lea H Soderstrom; Melanie S Jefferson; Barbara C Tilley Journal: Health Soc Work Date: 2013-02