Literature DB >> 17198293

A web-based system for students to document their experiences within six core competency domains during all clinical clerkships.

David W Nierenberg1, M Scottie Eliassen, Stephen B McAllister, Brian P Reid, Catherine Florio Pipas, William W Young, Greg S Ogrinc.   

Abstract

The authors describe the design and implementation of a new Web-based system that allows students to record important features of their clinical encounters during all 10 required clinical clerkships, document their learning experiences in six major competency domains, and generate detailed real-time reports for themselves and their clerkship directors. A new Web-based system, DMEDS (Dartmouth Medical Encounter Documentation System), accepts input from computers and PDAs. Its design permits students to describe their patients, learning sites, interactions with preceptors, and important aspects of their clinical encounters in all of our medical school's competency domains. Using a common format for all required clerkships, clerkship directors select specific items most relevant to their clerkships from a common menu and set learning targets for specific diagnoses and clinical skills. This new system was designed in the fall of 2003, tested in the spring of 2004, and implemented in all clerkships for the 2004 to 2005 academic year. During the first full academic year that DMEDS was used, students documented nearly 32,000 discrete student-patient-preceptor encounters, an average of between 21 and 120 clinical encounters per Year 3 clerkship. Highlights of the analysis of these initial data include the following: (1) insights into how educational targets are set, (2) the extent of site-to-site variation in clerkship experiences, (3) the epidemiology of patients' declining student involvement, and (4) student experiences in and understanding of the newer competency domains.DMEDS can be used in all clinical clerkships and can address student experiences in all competency domains. It provides substantial value to students, clerkship directors, preceptors, and medical school administrators. As secondary benefits, the authors found that DMEDS facilitates educational research and is readily adapted for use in residency and fellowship programs as well. Student feedback highlights the need to pay close attention to the time invested by students documenting their clinical encounters. Course directors must ensure that the benefits to students (such as knowledge of meeting learning targets and preceptors providing direct feedback to students) are transparent. Finally, for other schools contemplating the change to a competency-based curriculum with the use of a clinical encounter documentation system, the time required for both students and faculty to adopt and fully engage these major educational culture shifts seems to be at least several years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17198293     DOI: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000249990.86538.ac

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  5 in total

1.  Opening the black box: the patient mix of GP trainees.

Authors:  Jip de Jong; Mechteld R M Visser; Jacob Mohrs; Margreet Wieringa-de Waard
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Report of the 2014-2015 Professional Affairs Standing Committee: Producing Practice-Ready Pharmacy Graduates in an Era of Value-Based Health Care.

Authors:  Charles T Taylor; Alex J Adams; Erin L Albert; Elizabeth A Cardello; Kalin Clifford; Jay D Currie; Michael Gonyeau; Steven P Nelson; Lynette R Bradley-Baker
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-10-25       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Medical student patient experiences before and after duty hour regulation and hospitalist support.

Authors:  Lee A Lindquist; Marianne Tschoe; David Neely; Joseph Feinglass; Gary J Martin; David W Baker
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Tracking Patient Encounters and Clinical Skills to Determine Competency in Ambulatory Care Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences.

Authors:  Jody L Lounsbery; Chrystian R Pereira; Ila M Harris; Jean Y Moon; Sarah M Westberg; Claire Kolar
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Study protocol: the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) study.

Authors:  Simon Morgan; Parker J Magin; Kim M Henderson; Susan M Goode; John Scott; Steven J Bowe; Catherine M Regan; Kevin P Sweeney; Julian Jackel; Mieke L van Driel
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.497

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.