Literature DB >> 17197970

A prospective pathologic analysis using whole-mount sections of rectal cancer following preoperative combined modality therapy: implications for sphincter preservation.

Jose G Guillem1, David B Chessin, Jinru Shia, Arief Suriawinata, Elyn Riedel, Harvey G Moore, Bruce D Minsky, W Douglas Wong.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to use a comprehensive whole-mount pathologic analysis to characterize microscopic patterns of residual disease, as well as circumferential and distal resection margins, in rectal cancer treated with preoperative CMT; and to identify clinicopathologic factors associated with residual disease. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Recent studies have shown that preoperative combined modality therapy (CMT) for rectal cancer enhances rates of sphincter preservation. However, the efficacy of preoperative CMT in conjunction with a total mesorectal excision (TME)-based resection, in terms of resection margins using whole-mount sections, has not been reported. Furthermore, since patterns of residual disease and extent of distal spread following preoperative CMT are largely unknown, intraoperative determination of distal rectal transection remains a surgical challenge.
METHODS: We prospectively accrued 109 patients with endorectal ultrasound (ERUS)-staged, locally advanced rectal cancer (T2-T4 and/or N1), located a median distance of 7 cm from the anal verge, requiring preoperative CMT, and undergoing a TME-based resection. Comprehensive whole-mount pathologic analysis was performed, with particular emphasis on extent of residual disease, margin status, and intramural tumor extension. Clinicopathologic factors associated with residual disease were identified.
RESULTS: A sphincter-preserving resection was feasible in 87 patients (80%), and in all 109 patients, distal margins were negative (median, 2.1 cm; range, 0.4-10 cm). Intramural extension beyond the gross mucosal edge of residual tumor was observed in only 2 patients (1.8%), both < or =0.95 cm. There were no positive circumferential margins (median, 10 mm; range, 1-28 mm), although 6 were less than or equal to 1 mm. On multivariate analysis, residual disease was observed more frequently in distally located tumors (distance from anal verge <5 cm) (P = 0.03).
CONCLUSION: Our comprehensive pathologic analysis suggests that, following preoperative CMT and a TME-based resection, distal margins of 1 cm may provide for complete removal of locally advanced rectal cancer. Although residual cancer following preoperative CMT was more likely in the setting of distally located tumors, occult tumor beneath the mucosal edge was rare and, when present, limited to less than 1 cm. Our results extend the indications for sphincter preservation, as distal resection margins of only 1 cm may be acceptable for rectal cancer treated with preoperative CMT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17197970      PMCID: PMC1867929          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000232540.82364.43

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  21 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  A Wibe; P R Rendedal; E Svensson; J Norstein; T J Eide; H E Myrvold; O Søreide
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Rolf Sauer; Heinz Becker; Werner Hohenberger; Claus Rödel; Christian Wittekind; Rainer Fietkau; Peter Martus; Jörg Tschmelitsch; Eva Hager; Clemens F Hess; Johann-H Karstens; Torsten Liersch; Heinz Schmidberger; Rudolf Raab
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Sphincter-saving resection for all rectal carcinomas: the end of the 2-cm distal rule.

Authors:  Eric Rullier; Christophe Laurent; Frédéric Bretagnol; Anne Rullier; Véronique Vendrely; Frank Zerbib
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Distal margin requirements after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for distal rectal carcinomas: are < or = 1 cm distal margins sufficient?

Authors:  B Kuvshinoff; I Maghfoor; B Miedema; M Bryer; S Westgate; J Wilkes; D Ota
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Clinical examination following preoperative chemoradiation for rectal cancer is not a reliable surrogate end point.

Authors:  Jose G Guillem; David B Chessin; Jinru Shia; Harvey G Moore; Madhu Mazumdar; Bianca Bernard; Philip B Paty; Leonard Saltz; Bruce D Minsky; Martin R Weiser; Larissa K F Temple; Alfred M Cohen; W Douglas Wong
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-05-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Adenocarcinoma of the lower third of the rectum surgically treated with a <10-MM distal clearance: preliminary results in 35 N0 patients.

Authors:  S Andreola; E Leo; F Belli; G Bonfanti; G Sirizzotti; P Greco; F Valvo; G Tomasic; G F Gallino
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Prospective assessment of primary rectal cancer response to preoperative radiation and chemotherapy using 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.

Authors:  J G Guillem; J Puig-La Calle; T Akhurst; S Tickoo; L Ruo; B D Minsky; M J Gollub; D S Klimstra; M Mazumdar; P B Paty; H Macapinlac; H Yeung; L Saltz; R D Finn; Y Erdi; J Humm; A M Cohen; S Larson
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Circumferential margin involvement after mesorectal excision of rectal cancer with curative intent. Predictor of survival but not local recurrence?

Authors:  N R Hall; P J Finan; T al-Jaberi; C S Tsang; S R Brown; M F Dixon; P Quirke
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Long-term prognostic significance of extent of rectal cancer response to preoperative radiation and chemotherapy.

Authors:  Leyo Ruo; Satish Tickoo; David S Klimstra; Bruce D Minsky; Leonard Saltz; Madhu Mazumdar; Philip B Paty; W Douglas Wong; Steven M Larson; Alfred M Cohen; Jose G Guillem
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection.

Authors:  Arne Wibe; Astri Syse; Elisabeth Andersen; Steinar Tretli; Helge E Myrvold; Odd Søreide
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  40 in total

1.  Risk factors for persistent anal incontinence after restorative proctectomy in rectal cancer patients with anal incontinence: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Taek-Gu Lee; Sung-Bum Kang; Seung Chul Heo; Seung-Yong Jeong; Kyu Joo Park
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Completely abdominal intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer: feasibility and comparison of robot-assisted and open surgery.

Authors:  Jin C Kim; Seok-B Lim; Yong S Yoon; In J Park; Chan W Kim; Chang N Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  A review on functional results of sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer: the anterior resection syndrome.

Authors:  Filippo Pucciani
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2013-06-11

4.  Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on distal spread of low rectal cancer located close to the anus.

Authors:  Akihiro Kondo; Yuichiro Tsukada; Motohiro Kojima; Yuji Nishizawa; Takeshi Sasaki; Yasuyuki Suzuki; Masaaki Ito
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Autonomic nerve preservation during rectal cancer resection.

Authors:  José G Guillem; Steven A Lee-Kong
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Hospital variation in sphincter preservation for elderly rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Christopher M Dodgion; Bridget A Neville; Stuart R Lipsitz; Deborah Schrag; Elizabeth Breen; Michael J Zinner; Caprice C Greenberg
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-03-22       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  Distal resection margins in rectal cancer specimens: differences in assessment between surgeons and pathologists and the influence of neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

Authors:  T L Ghezzi; C Tarta; P C Contu; A R Lazzaron; B M Contin; L M Kliemann; D C Damin
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-06-07

8.  p27 expression in post-treatment rectal cancer: a potential novel approach for predicting residual nodal disease.

Authors:  Tobias Leibold; Vanessa W Hui; Jinru Shia; Jeannine A Ruby; Elyn R Riedel; José G Guillem
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 9.  Evolving treatment strategies for colorectal cancer: a critical review of current therapeutic options.

Authors:  Daniel C Damin; Anderson R Lazzaron
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Intra-operative measurement of surgical lengths of the rectum and the peritoneal reflection in Korean.

Authors:  Hae Ran Yun; Ho-Kyung Chun; Won Suk Lee; Yong Beom Cho; Seong Hyeon Yun; Woo Yong Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.