OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the safety of CD4 cell count and plasma HIV-1 RNA (pVL)-guided treatment interruptions (GTI) and determined predictors of duration of treatment interruption. METHODS:Chronically HIV-1-infected adults with sustained CD4 cell counts > 500 cells/microl and pVL < 50 copies/ml were randomly assigned to either continue with standard antiretroviral therapy (control group, n = 101) or to interrupt therapy aimed at maintaining CD4 cell counts > 350 cells/microl and pVL < 100,000 copies/ml (GTI group, n = 100). Both groups were followed for 2 years. RESULTS: There were no AIDS-defining illnesses or deaths in either group. Compared to controls, subjects interrupting therapy reduced treatment exposure by 67%, but suffered significantly more adverse events related to the intake of medication or to therapy interruption [relative hazard, 2.71; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.64-4.49; P < 0.001), mainly due to an excess in mononucleosis-like symptoms. While GTI subjects demonstrated improvements in the psychosocial spheres of quality of life and pain reporting, GTI had no effect on the physical aspects of quality of life. Although both groups had a similar hazard for developing CD4 cell count < 200 cells/microl; at least 10% of subjects on GTI had CD4 cell counts < 350 cells/microl at every time point. Drug resistance mutations were detected in 36% of subjects but were selected de novo only in subjects interrupting non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor therapy. Lower CD4 cell count nadir, higher set-point pVL and prior exposure to suboptimal regimens were all independent predictors of the need to reinitiate treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, GTI were not as safe as continuing therapy. Despite achieving some improvements in quality of life, GTI did not reduce the overall rate of management-related adverse events.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the safety of CD4 cell count and plasma HIV-1 RNA (pVL)-guided treatment interruptions (GTI) and determined predictors of duration of treatment interruption. METHODS: Chronically HIV-1-infected adults with sustained CD4 cell counts > 500 cells/microl and pVL < 50 copies/ml were randomly assigned to either continue with standard antiretroviral therapy (control group, n = 101) or to interrupt therapy aimed at maintaining CD4 cell counts > 350 cells/microl and pVL < 100,000 copies/ml (GTI group, n = 100). Both groups were followed for 2 years. RESULTS: There were no AIDS-defining illnesses or deaths in either group. Compared to controls, subjects interrupting therapy reduced treatment exposure by 67%, but suffered significantly more adverse events related to the intake of medication or to therapy interruption [relative hazard, 2.71; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.64-4.49; P < 0.001), mainly due to an excess in mononucleosis-like symptoms. While GTI subjects demonstrated improvements in the psychosocial spheres of quality of life and pain reporting, GTI had no effect on the physical aspects of quality of life. Although both groups had a similar hazard for developing CD4 cell count < 200 cells/microl; at least 10% of subjects on GTI had CD4 cell counts < 350 cells/microl at every time point. Drug resistance mutations were detected in 36% of subjects but were selected de novo only in subjects interrupting non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor therapy. Lower CD4 cell count nadir, higher set-point pVL and prior exposure to suboptimal regimens were all independent predictors of the need to reinitiate treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, GTI were not as safe as continuing therapy. Despite achieving some improvements in quality of life, GTI did not reduce the overall rate of management-related adverse events.
Authors: Jose A Muñoz-Moreno; Carmina R Fumaz; Anna Prats; Maria J Ferrer; Eugènia Negredo; Núria Pérez-Alvarez; José Moltó; Guadalupe Gómez; Maite Garolera; Bonaventura Clotet Journal: J Neurovirol Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 2.643
Authors: Moupali Das-Douglas; Elise D Riley; Kathleen Ragland; David Guzman; Richard Clark; Margot B Kushel; David R Bangsberg Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2008-05-16
Authors: Viviane M Andrade; Carla Mavian; Dunja Babic; Thaissa Cordeiro; Mark Sharkey; Labelle Barrios; Christian Brander; Javier Martinez-Picado; Judith Dalmau; Anuska Llano; Jonathan Z Li; Jeffrey Jacobson; Christy L Lavine; Michael S Seaman; Marco Salemi; Mario Stevenson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-04-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: James H Willig; Sarah Abroms; Andrew O Westfall; Justin Routman; Sunil Adusumilli; Mohit Varshney; Jeroan Allison; Ashlee Chatham; James L Raper; Richard A Kaslow; Michael S Saag; Michael J Mugavero Journal: AIDS Date: 2008-10-01 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Brian O Porter; Kara B Anthony; Jean Shen; Barbara Hahn; Chris E Keh; Frank Maldarelli; William C Blackwelder; Henry Clifford Lane; Joseph A Kovacs; Richard T Davey; Irini Sereti Journal: AIDS Date: 2009-01-14 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Daniel J Skiest; Amy Krambrink; Zhaohui Su; Kevin R Robertson; David M Margolis Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2008-12-01 Impact factor: 3.731