INTRODUCTION: Data on initial antiretroviral regimen longevity predates the arrival of newer nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor backbones and once-daily regimens. Modern regimens are thought to possess greater tolerability and convenience. We hypothesized this would translate into greater durability. METHODS: Retrospective study of antiretroviral-naive patients starting treatment at the University of Alabama at Birmingham 1917 HIV/AIDS Clinic 1 January 2000-31 July 2007. Two periods of antiretroviral initiation were identified, prior and after August 2004 (arrival of once-daily fixed-dose regimens). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses of regimen durability by time period and regimen characteristics were performed. Staged Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the roles of dosing complexity and composition in explaining differences in regimen durability between study periods. RESULTS: Overall 542 patients started antiretroviral drugs (n = 309, January 2000-July 2004; n = 233, August 2004-July 2007). Median durability was 263 days longer in after August 2004 regimens. Regimens started before August 2004 had increased hazards for discontinuation relative to after August 2004 regimens [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.44; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.03-2.02]. Time period of initiation lost statistical significance when the model included dosing frequency (HR = 1.92 for at least twice daily vs. daily; 95% CI = 1.29-2.88). As regimen composition variables were added, time period and dosing frequency lost significance. Increased hazards of discontinuation were observed with didanosine or stavudine relative to abacavir or tenofovir use (HR = 1.92; 95% CI = 1.29-2.88) and all third drugs compared with non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based regimens (triple-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor HR = 1.76; 95% CI = 1.14-2.73; unboosted-protease inhibitor HR = 1.58; 95% CI = 1.02-2.46; boosted-protease inhibitor HR = 1.57; 95% CI = 1.02-2.41). Affective mental health disorders increased the hazard of discontinuation in all models. CONCLUSION: Durability of contemporary once-daily fixed-dose antiretroviral regimens has significantly eclipsed the duration of earlier antiretroviral drug options. Our results indicate this is due to both more convenient dosing and improved tolerability of modern antiretroviral regimens.
INTRODUCTION: Data on initial antiretroviral regimen longevity predates the arrival of newer nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor backbones and once-daily regimens. Modern regimens are thought to possess greater tolerability and convenience. We hypothesized this would translate into greater durability. METHODS: Retrospective study of antiretroviral-naive patients starting treatment at the University of Alabama at Birmingham 1917 HIV/AIDS Clinic 1 January 2000-31 July 2007. Two periods of antiretroviral initiation were identified, prior and after August 2004 (arrival of once-daily fixed-dose regimens). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses of regimen durability by time period and regimen characteristics were performed. Staged Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the roles of dosing complexity and composition in explaining differences in regimen durability between study periods. RESULTS: Overall 542 patients started antiretroviral drugs (n = 309, January 2000-July 2004; n = 233, August 2004-July 2007). Median durability was 263 days longer in after August 2004 regimens. Regimens started before August 2004 had increased hazards for discontinuation relative to after August 2004 regimens [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.44; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.03-2.02]. Time period of initiation lost statistical significance when the model included dosing frequency (HR = 1.92 for at least twice daily vs. daily; 95% CI = 1.29-2.88). As regimen composition variables were added, time period and dosing frequency lost significance. Increased hazards of discontinuation were observed with didanosine or stavudine relative to abacavir or tenofovir use (HR = 1.92; 95% CI = 1.29-2.88) and all third drugs compared with non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based regimens (triple-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor HR = 1.76; 95% CI = 1.14-2.73; unboosted-protease inhibitor HR = 1.58; 95% CI = 1.02-2.46; boosted-protease inhibitor HR = 1.57; 95% CI = 1.02-2.41). Affective mental health disorders increased the hazard of discontinuation in all models. CONCLUSION: Durability of contemporary once-daily fixed-dose antiretroviral regimens has significantly eclipsed the duration of earlier antiretroviral drug options. Our results indicate this is due to both more convenient dosing and improved tolerability of modern antiretroviral regimens.
Authors: Beulah P Sabundayo; Julie H McArthur; Susan J Langan; Joel E Gallant; Joseph B Margolick Journal: Pharmacotherapy Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 4.705
Authors: Grace A McComsey; Denise M Paulsen; J Tyler Lonergan; Siegrid M Hessenthaler; Charles L Hoppel; Vanessa C Williams; Robin L Fisher; Catherine L Cherry; Cathy White-Owen; Katherine A Thompson; Steve T Ross; Jaime E Hernandez; Lisa L Ross Journal: AIDS Date: 2005-01-03 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: A d'Arminio Monforte; A C Lepri; G Rezza; P Pezzotti; A Antinori; A N Phillips; G Angarano; V Colangeli; A De Luca; G Ippolito; L Caggese; F Soscia; G Filice; F Gritti; P Narciso; U Tirelli; M Moroni Journal: AIDS Date: 2000-03-31 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: A Mocroft; A N Phillips; V Soriano; J Rockstroh; A Blaxhult; C Katlama; A Boron-Kaczmarska; L Viksna; O Kirk; J D Lundgren Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Michael Alan Horberg; Michael Jonah Silverberg; Leo Bartemeier Hurley; William James Towner; Daniel Benjamin Klein; Susan Bersoff-Matcha; Winkler Gabriel Weinberg; Diana Antoniskis; Miguel Mogyoros; Wayne Thomas Dodge; Robert Dobrinich; Charles Price Quesenberry; Drew Anthony Kovach Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2008-03-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Ray Y Chen; Andrew O Westfall; Michael J Mugavero; Gretchen A Cloud; James L Raper; Ashlee G Chatham; Edward P Acosta; Kelly H Taylor; Jerome Carter; Michael S Saag Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2003-08-13 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Laura Gratacòs; Montse Tuset; Carles Codina; José M Miró; Josep Mallolas; Núria Miserachs; Maria Teresa Martín-Conde; Elena del Cacho; Elisa de Lazzari; Josep Ribas; Josep M Gatell Journal: Med Clin (Barc) Date: 2006-02-25 Impact factor: 1.725
Authors: Nancy A Hessol; Susan Holman; Howard Minkoff; Mardge H Cohen; Elizabeth T Golub; Seble Kassaye; Roksana Karim; Oluwakemi Sosanya; Christopher Shaheen; Zaher Merhi Journal: AIDS Care Date: 2015-08-14
Authors: James A McKinnell; James H Willig; Andrew O Westfall; Christa Nevin; Jeroan J Allison; James L Raper; Michael J Mugavero; Michael S Saag Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Bora Youn; Theresa I Shireman; Yoojin Lee; Omar Galárraga; Aadia I Rana; Amy C Justice; Ira B Wilson Journal: AIDS Date: 2017-07-31 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Benjamin H Chi; Albert Mwango; Mark Giganti; Lloyd B Mulenga; Bushimbwa Tambatamba-Chapula; Stewart E Reid; Carolyn Bolton-Moore; Namwinga Chintu; Priscilla L Mulenga; Elizabeth M Stringer; Robert Sheneberger; Peter Mwaba; Jeffrey S A Stringer Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2010-05-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Kimberly B Ulett; James H Willig; Hui-Yi Lin; Justin S Routman; Sarah Abroms; Jeroan Allison; Ashlee Chatham; James L Raper; Michael S Saag; Michael J Mugavero Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: James H Willig; Andrew O Westfall; Michael Mugavero; Christa R Nevin; Todd Correll; Amit Duggal; William Guyer; Michael S Saag; Timothy Juday Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2012-12-18 Impact factor: 2.205