Vera F Gutiérrez-Clellen1, M Adelaida Restrepo, Gabriela Simón-Cereijido. 1. School of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, and SDSU/UCSD Joint Doctoral Program in Language and Communicative Disorders, San Diego State University 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA 92182-1518, USA. vclellen@mail.sdsu.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the discriminant accuracy of a grammatical measure for the identification of language impairment in Latino Spanish-speaking children. The authors hypothesized that if exposure to and use of English as a second language have an effect on the first language, bilingual children might exhibit lower rates of grammatical accuracy than their peers and be more likely to be misclassified. METHOD: Eighty children with typical language development and 80 with language impairment were sampled from 4 different geographical regions and compared using linear discriminant function analysis. RESULTS: Results indicated fair-to-good sensitivity from 4;0 to 5;1 years, good sensitivity from 5;2 to 5;11 years, and poor sensitivity above age 6 years. The discriminant functions derived from the exploratory studies were able to predict group membership in confirmatory analyses with fair-to-excellent sensitivity up to age 6 years. Children who were bilingual did not show lower scores and were not more likely to be misclassified compared with their Spanish-only peers. CONCLUSIONS: The measure seems to be appropriate for identifying language impairment in either Spanish-dominant or Spanish-only speakers between 4 and 6 years of age. However, for older children, supplemental testing is necessary.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the discriminant accuracy of a grammatical measure for the identification of language impairment in Latino Spanish-speaking children. The authors hypothesized that if exposure to and use of English as a second language have an effect on the first language, bilingual children might exhibit lower rates of grammatical accuracy than their peers and be more likely to be misclassified. METHOD: Eighty children with typical language development and 80 with language impairment were sampled from 4 different geographical regions and compared using linear discriminant function analysis. RESULTS: Results indicated fair-to-good sensitivity from 4;0 to 5;1 years, good sensitivity from 5;2 to 5;11 years, and poor sensitivity above age 6 years. The discriminant functions derived from the exploratory studies were able to predict group membership in confirmatory analyses with fair-to-excellent sensitivity up to age 6 years. Children who were bilingual did not show lower scores and were not more likely to be misclassified compared with their Spanish-only peers. CONCLUSIONS: The measure seems to be appropriate for identifying language impairment in either Spanish-dominant or Spanish-only speakers between 4 and 6 years of age. However, for older children, supplemental testing is necessary.
Authors: S Ellis Weismer; J B Tomblin; X Zhang; P Buckwalter; J G Chynoweth; M Jones Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 2.297
Authors: Stephanie M Grasso; Elizabeth D Peña; Lisa M Bedore; J Gregory Hixon; Zenzi M Griffin Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 2.297
Authors: Anny P Castilla-Earls; María Adelaida Restrepo; Ana Teresa Perez-Leroux; Shelley Gray; Paul Holmes; Daniel Gail; Ziqiang Chen Journal: Appl Psycholinguist Date: 2015-11-25