Literature DB >> 17196910

Hospice partnerships with academic entities: philosophical and historical background and assessment of future needs.

David C Tolley1, Richard Payne.   

Abstract

There is consensus that more research is needed to help improve care at the end of life. Despite the fact that hospices take care of more and more dying persons every year, hospice organizations have not been highly involved in research. The National Hospice Work Group is comprised of hospice organizations that have made promotion of research a high priority. Structured interviews were conducted with members of the National Hospice Work Group to investigate how they think about the role of academic partners in their organizational missions, what their histories of involvement with academic partners are, and what they see as their most important academic needs for continuing to advance the research agenda. Members of the National Hospice Work Group see strategic partnerships with academic entities as essential to the goal of advancing research in end-of-life care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17196910     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.10.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  3 in total

1.  Addressing Methodological Challenges in Large Communication Data Sets: Collecting and Coding Longitudinal Interactions in Home Hospice Cancer Care.

Authors:  Maija Reblin; Margaret F Clayton; Kevin K John; Lee Ellington
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2015-11-18

Review 2.  Culture and end of life care: a scoping exercise in seven European countries.

Authors:  Marjolein Gysels; Natalie Evans; Arantza Meñaca; Erin Andrew; Franco Toscani; Sylvia Finetti; H Roeline Pasman; Irene Higginson; Richard Harding; Robert Pool
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Patient, caregiver, health professional and researcher views and experiences of participating in research at the end of life: a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature.

Authors:  Marjolein H Gysels; Catherine Evans; Irene J Higginson
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 4.615

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.