Literature DB >> 17196630

Delivery methods for peptide and protein toxins in insect control.

Paul A Whetstone1, Bruce D Hammock.   

Abstract

Since the introduction of DDT in the 1940s, arthropod pest control has relied heavily upon chemical insecticides. However, the development of insect resistance, an increased awareness of the real and perceived environmental and health impacts of these chemicals, and the need for systems with a smaller environmental footprint has stimulated the search for new insecticidal compounds, novel molecular targets, and alternative control methods. In recent decades a variety of biocontrol methods employing peptidic or proteinaceous insect-specific toxins derived from microbes, plants and animals have been examined in the laboratory and field with varying results. Among the many interdependent factors involved with the production of a cost-effective pesticide--production expense, kill efficiency, environmental persistence, pest-specificity, pest resistance-development, public perception and ease of delivery--sprayable biopesticides have not yet found equal competitive footing with chemical counterparts. However, while protein/peptide-based biopesticides continue to have limitations, advances in the technology, particularly of genetically modified organisms as biopesticidal delivery systems, has continually progressed. This review highlights the varieties of delivery methods currently practiced, examining the strengths and weaknesses of each method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17196630     DOI: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2006.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicon        ISSN: 0041-0101            Impact factor:   3.033


  7 in total

1.  Expression of immune-response genes in lepidopteran host is suppressed by venom from an endoparasitoid, Pteromalus puparum.

Authors:  Qi Fang; Lei Wang; Jiaying Zhu; Yanmin Li; Qisheng Song; David W Stanley; Zunnu-Raen Akhtar; Gongyin Ye
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 3.969

2.  Sequence analysis of lysozyme C from the scorpion mesobuthus eupeus venom glands using semi-nested rt-PCR.

Authors:  M Baradaran; A Jolodar; A Jalali; Sh Navidpour; F Kafilzadeh
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 0.611

3.  Effect of channel blockers on the smooth muscle of the adult crop of the queen blowfly, Phormia regina.

Authors:  John G Stoffolano; Laura Danai; James Chambers
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.857

4.  A recombinant fusion protein containing a spider toxin specific for the insect voltage-gated sodium ion channel shows oral toxicity towards insects of different orders.

Authors:  Sheng Yang; Prashant Pyati; Elaine Fitches; John A Gatehouse
Journal:  Insect Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 4.714

Review 5.  Fungal Ribotoxins: A Review of Potential Biotechnological Applications.

Authors:  Miriam Olombrada; Rodrigo Lázaro-Gorines; Juan C López-Rodríguez; Álvaro Martínez-Del-Pozo; Mercedes Oñaderra; Moisés Maestro-López; Javier Lacadena; José G Gavilanes; Lucía García-Ortega
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 4.546

6.  A Novel Insecticidal Peptide SLP1 Produced by Streptomyces laindensis H008 against Lipaphis erysimi.

Authors:  Lijian Xu; Kangkang Liang; Bensha Duan; Mengdi Yu; Wei Meng; Qinggui Wang; Qiong Yu
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 7.  Spider-venom peptides as bioinsecticides.

Authors:  Monique J Windley; Volker Herzig; Sławomir A Dziemborowicz; Margaret C Hardy; Glenn F King; Graham M Nicholson
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.546

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.