Literature DB >> 17196599

Intrinsic mechanical properties of trabecular calcaneus determined by finite-element models using 3D synchrotron microtomography.

H Follet1, F Peyrin, E Vidal-Salle, A Bonnassie, C Rumelhart, P J Meunier.   

Abstract

To determine intrinsic mechanical properties (elastic and failure) of trabecular calcaneus bone, chosen as a good predictor of hip fracture, we looked for the influence of image's size on a numerical simulation. One cubic sample of cancellous bone (9 x 9 x 9 mm(3)) was removed from the body of the calcaneus (6 females, 6 males, 79+/-9 yr). These samples were tested under compressive loading. Before compressive testing, these samples were imaged at 10.13 microm resolution using a 3D microcomputed tomography (muCT) (ESRF, France). The muCT images were converted to finite-element models. Depending on the bone density values (BV/TV), we compared two different finite element models: a linear hexahedral and a linear beam finite element models. Apparent experimental Young's modulus (E(app)(exp)) and maximum apparent experimental compressive stress (sigma(max)(exp)) were significantly correlated with bone density obtained by Archimedes's test (E(app)(exp)=236+/-231 MPa [19-742 MPa], sigma(max)(exp)=2.61+/-1.97 MPa [0.28-5.81 MPa], r>0.80, p<0.001). Under threshold at 40 microm, the size of the numerical samples (5.18(3) and 6.68(3)mm(3)) seems to be an important parameter on the accuracy of the results. The numerical trabecular Young's modulus was widely higher (E(trabecular)(num)=34,182+/-22,830 MPa [9700-87,211 MPa]) for the larger numerical samples and high BV/TV than those found classically by other techniques (4700-15,000 MPa). For rod-like bone samples (BV/TV<12%, n=7), Young's modulus, using linear beam element (E(trabecular)(num-skeleton): 10,305+/-5500 MPa), were closer to the Young's modulus found by other techniques. Those results show the limitation of hexahedral finite elements at 40 microm, mostly used, for thin trabecular structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17196599     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.10.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  3 in total

1.  Multi-scale modelling of elastic moduli of trabecular bone.

Authors:  Elham Hamed; Iwona Jasiuk; Andrew Yoo; Yikhan Lee; Tadeusz Liszka
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  MicroCT morphometry analysis of mouse cancellous bone: intra- and inter-system reproducibility.

Authors:  K Verdelis; L Lukashova; E Atti; P Mayer-Kuckuk; M G E Peterson; S Tetradis; A L Boskey; M C H van der Meulen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Standardizing compression testing for measuring the stiffness of human bone.

Authors:  S Zhao; M Arnold; S Ma; R L Abel; J P Cobb; U Hansen; O Boughton
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 5.853

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.