Literature DB >> 17192888

Balance between endoscopic and genetic information in the choice of ileorectal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis.

Rosa Valanzano1, Ferdinando Ficari, Maria Cristina Curia, Gitana Aceto, Serena Veschi, Alessandro Cama, Pasquale Battista, Francesco Tonelli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The number of rectal polyps and the site of mutations in the APC (Adenomatous polyposis coli) gene have been used to guide the surgical management in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). The aim of this study is to assess the utility of the APC mutation screening compared to the degree of the rectal polyposis in surgical decision making.
METHODS: The post-surgical courses of 25 patients submitted to subtotal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) were reviewed. Preservation of the rectum was prospectively decided on the basis of well-defined endoscopic criteria. The number of rectal polyps was assessed preoperatively and every 6-12 months. APC gene was screened for mutations by heteroduplex analysis, single strand conformation polymorphism, in vitro synthesized protein (IVSP), and DNA sequencing. Patients negative for APC mutations were tested for MYH mutations.
RESULTS: On the basis of preoperative polyp rectal count we categorized patients as follows: Group I, 5 or fewer adenomas; Group II, 6-9 adenomas; Group III, 10 or more adenomas. After a follow-up ranging from 12 to 225 months we have observed a significant difference of recurrent rectal adenomas between Groups I-II versus III. No difference was detected among patients of Group I and II. The mean number of adenomas/year/patient was 0.67, 1.62, and 9.29 for Group I, II, and III, respectively. Carpeting polyposis of the rectal stump developed in three patients with APC mutation at codon 1309 and two of them needed later proctectomy. Diffuse rectal polyposis was observed in one patient with mutation at exon 9 who had 10 small polyps at time of surgery. Mutation at the 5'-end of APC (codons 144-232), mutation of MYH and unknown APC or MYH mutation were correlated with a low number of polyps both at presentation and follow-up. No IRA patients developed rectal cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: In our experience fewer than 10 rectal polyps at presentation can predict a favorable outcome after IRA. Identification of specific germ-line APC or MYH mutation can address the choice of surgical treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17192888     DOI: 10.1002/jso.20672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  9 in total

1.  The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Inherited Polyposis Syndromes.

Authors:  Daniel Herzig; Karin Hardiman; Martin Weiser; Nancy You; Ian Paquette; Daniel L Feingold; Scott R Steele
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Comparison of proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis to colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis in familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  L Koskenvuo; H Mustonen; L Renkonen-Sinisalo; H J Järvinen; A Lepistö
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Risk of cancer and secondary proctectomy after colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis in familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  L Koskenvuo; L Renkonen-Sinisalo; H J Järvinen; A Lepistö
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-11-30       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Long-term outcome of metachronous rectal cancer following ileorectal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Tomohiro Yamaguchi; Seiichiro Yamamoto; Shin Fujita; Takayuki Akasu; Yoshihiro Moriya
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Rectal cancers in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Jennifer Liang; James M Church
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Rectal and pouch recurrences after surgical treatment for familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Fabio Guilherme Campos; Antonio Rocco Imperiale; Víctor Edmond Seid; Rodrigo Oliva Perez; Afonso Henrique da Silva e Sousa; Desidério Roberto Kiss; Angelita Habr-Gama; Ivan Cecconello
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Familial adenomatous polyposis: challenges and pitfalls of surgical treatment.

Authors:  Satish K Warrier; Matthew F Kalady
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2012-06

Review 8.  Risk of ileal pouch neoplasms in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Masahiro Tajika; Yasumasa Niwa; Vikram Bhatia; Tsutomu Tanaka; Makoto Ishihara; Kenji Yamao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  The prognosis of clinical course and the analysis of the frequency of the inflammation and dysplasia in the intestinal J-pouch at the patients after restorative proctocolectomy due to FAP.

Authors:  Tomasz Banasiewicz; Ryszard Marciniak; Elzbieta Kaczmarek; Piotr Krokowicz; Jacek Paszkowski; Aleksandra Lozynska-Nelke; Piotr Gronek; Andrzej Plawski; Michal Drews
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 2.571

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.