Literature DB >> 19937474

Long-term outcome of metachronous rectal cancer following ileorectal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis.

Tomohiro Yamaguchi1, Seiichiro Yamamoto, Shin Fujita, Takayuki Akasu, Yoshihiro Moriya.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) carries a potential risk of metachronous cancer in the residual rectum. This study evaluated the risk of cancer development in the residual rectum.
METHODS: Ninety-six patients who underwent initial surgery for prevention and cure of FAP were studied, and a clinicopathologic comparison was conducted between 59 patients who underwent IRA and 24 who underwent total proctocolectomy.
RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival rates were 94% after IRA and 95% after total proctocolectomy with no significant difference. The incidence of dense-type rectal polyps (4/17, 24%) was significantly higher in patients who developed metachronous rectal cancer following IRA compared to that in patients who did not (1/39, 3%). Moreover, 60% of patients with dense-type colon polyps developed metachronous rectal cancer compared to 24% in patients without and 80% of those with dense type rectal polyps developed metachronous rectal cancer compared to 25% without. Endoscopic surveillance of the eight Tis or T1 patients was performed at intervals of 6 months to 1 year after IRA but was not performed in three T3 patients for more than 2 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Effective IRA requires selection of patients without invasive rectal cancer and without dense rectal polyps in whom long-term postoperative follow-up of the residual rectum is possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19937474     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-009-1105-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  24 in total

1.  Rectal cancer risk in older patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and an ileorectal anastomosis: a cause for concern.

Authors:  K P Nugent; R K Phillips
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 2.  Meta-analysis of observational studies of ileorectal versus ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  O Aziz; T Athanasiou; V W Fazio; R J Nicholls; A W Darzi; J Church; R K S Phillips; P P Tekkis
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Risk factors for rectal cancer morbidity and mortality in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis after colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis.

Authors:  J A Björk; H I Akerbrant; L E Iselius; R W Hultcrantz
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 4.  Correlations between mutation site in APC and phenotype of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP): a review of the literature.

Authors:  M H Nieuwenhuis; H F A Vasen
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 6.312

5.  Ileorectal anastomosis is appropriate for a subset of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  C Bülow; H Vasen; H Järvinen; J Björk; M L Bisgaard; S Bülow
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Mortality in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  M L Arvanitis; D G Jagelman; V W Fazio; I C Lavery; E McGannon
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Female fecundity before and after operation for familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  K Ø Olsen; S Juul; S Bülow; H J Järvinen; A Bakka; J Björk; T Oresland; S Laurberg
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Rectal cancer following colectomy for polyposis.

Authors:  M A Bess; M A Adson; L R Elveback; C G Moertel
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1980-04

9.  The impact of familial adenomatous polyposis on the tumorigenesis and mortality at the several organs. Its rational treatment.

Authors:  T Iwama; Y Mishima; J Utsunomiya
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  The risk of developing rectal cancer after colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis in Danish patients with polyposis coli.

Authors:  S Bülow
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  3 in total

1.  Comparison of proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis to colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis in familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  L Koskenvuo; H Mustonen; L Renkonen-Sinisalo; H J Järvinen; A Lepistö
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Rectal cancers in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Jennifer Liang; James M Church
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  The prognosis of clinical course and the analysis of the frequency of the inflammation and dysplasia in the intestinal J-pouch at the patients after restorative proctocolectomy due to FAP.

Authors:  Tomasz Banasiewicz; Ryszard Marciniak; Elzbieta Kaczmarek; Piotr Krokowicz; Jacek Paszkowski; Aleksandra Lozynska-Nelke; Piotr Gronek; Andrzej Plawski; Michal Drews
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 2.571

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.