Literature DB >> 17192828

[The design of the VISEP trial. Critical appraisal].

R Zander1, J Boldt, L Engelmann, F Mertzlufft, C Sirtl, R Stuttmann.   

Abstract

The survey transcript of the VISEP interventional trial "Prospective randomized multicenter study on the influence of colloid vs crystalloid volume resuscitation and of intensive vs conventional insulin therapy on outcome in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock" [Clinical trials.gov. identifier: NCT00135473; study start April 2003] comprises, according to the data of the year 2003, methodological shortcomings which challenge a priori the study design and thus the resolution of the purpose of the study, i.e., "determination of the influence of the studied volume and insulin interventions on morbidity and mortality of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock". The most important points of criticism are: 1. A volume therapy with exclusively crystalloids or colloids with the chosen colloid hyperoncotic, hyperchloremic HES solution (10% hydroxyethyl starch: 10% Hemohes) or the crystalloid solution with high lactate content (Sterofundin) is neither acceptable nor practicable, even if only due to exceeding the maximum dosage as recommended by the manufacturer. 2. The fact known since the year 2001 that high molecular weight, poorly biodegradable HES preparations can present an independent risk-factor for acute kidney failure in patients with sepsis or septic shock was ignored: the exclusion criterion of a serum-creatinine value of >320 micromol/l (>3.6 mg/dl) was doubled in relation to the manufacturer's specification. 3. The hyperoncotic colloid solution used (10% Hemohes) may only be employed for a brief period: it is highly hyperchloremic and causes extravascular hypohydration with consecutive reduction of renal excretion, which together with HES is a fatal combination. 4. The crystalloid solution used, i.e., Sterofundin, which contains 45 mmol/l lactate, is contraindicated with septic shock as it increases the patient's O2 consumption, hinders lactate diagnostics as a hypoxia marker by simultaneous lactate infusion, and through increased gluconeogenesis leads to hyperglycemia, at least with diabetics. 5. It is doubtful whether an intensified insulin therapy (Actrapid) can be successful if insulin is administered simultaneously with iatrogenic hyperglycemia as a result of lactate influx. Due to these flaws in the design of the VISEP trial, the only consequence can be that the results of the survey are unusable, especially with regard to the point "HES and kidney function". Thus, any further advance presentations and interpretations should be shelved in expectation of the authors' publication of all the data, in order to begin further discussions including the flaws in study design listed here.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17192828     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-006-1122-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Requirements and expectations for optimal volume replacement].

Authors:  R Zander; H A Adams; J Boldt; M J Hiesmayr; A Meier-Hellmann; D R Spahn; T Standl
Journal:  Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 0.698

2.  [Intensive care medicine: after positive studies questions occur].

Authors:  F M Brunkhorst; K Werdan
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 0.628

3.  Effects of an acute saline infusion on fluid and electrolyte metabolism in humans.

Authors:  C Drummer; R Gerzer; M Heer; B Molz; P Bie; M Schlossberger; C Stadaeger; L Röcker; F Strollo; B Heyduck
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1992-05

Review 4.  Volume replacement in critically ill patients with acute renal failure.

Authors:  M J Ragaller; H Theilen; T Koch
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 10.121

5.  The effects of balanced versus saline-based hetastarch and crystalloid solutions on acid-base and electrolyte status and gastric mucosal perfusion in elderly surgical patients.

Authors:  N J Wilkes; R Woolf; M Mutch; S V Mallett; T Peachey; R Stephens; M G Mythen
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Effects of hydroxyethylstarch and gelatin on renal function in severe sepsis: a multicentre randomised study.

Authors:  F Schortgen; J C Lacherade; F Bruneel; I Cattaneo; F Hemery; F Lemaire; L Brochard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-03-24       Impact factor: 79.321

  6 in total
  10 in total

Review 1.  Are renal adverse effects of hydroxyethyl starches merely a consequence of their incorrect use?

Authors:  Christiane S Hartog; Frank M Brunkhorst; Christoph Engel; Andreas Meier-Hellmann; Maximilian Ragaller; Tobias Welte; Evelyn Kuhnt; Konrad Reinhart
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 2.  [Limited applications for hydroxyethyl starch : background and alternative concepts].

Authors:  M Rehm
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  [Base excess. Parameter with exceptional clinical significance].

Authors:  W Schaffartzik
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Evaluation of the VIA Blood Chemistry Monitor for Glucose in Healthy and Diabetic Volunteers.

Authors:  Arjunan Ganesh; Brian Hipszer; Navdeep Loomba; Barbara Simon; Marc C Torjman; Jeffrey Joseph
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-03

Review 5.  [Glycemic control in sepsis and septic shock: friend or foe?].

Authors:  B Ellger; M Westphal; H D Stubbe; I Van den Heuvel; H Van Aken; G Van den Berghe
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 6.  Glucose control in the ICU: is there a time for more ambitious targets again?

Authors:  Martin Haluzik; Milos Mraz; Petr Kopecky; Michal Lips; Stepan Svacina
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-05-18

7.  Early fluid resuscitation with hyperoncotic hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 (10%) in severe burn injury.

Authors:  Markus Béchir; Milo A Puhan; Simona B Neff; Merlin Guggenheim; Volker Wedler; John F Stover; Reto Stocker; Thomas A Neff
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 8.  Hydroxyeyhyl starch: Controversies revisited.

Authors:  Rashmi Datta; Rajeev Nair; Anil Pandey; Nitish Gupta; Tapan Sahoo
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-10

Review 9.  Pro/con debate: should synthetic colloids be used in patients with septic shock?

Authors:  James Downar; Stephen E Lapinsky
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 10.  Diagnosis and treatment of severe sepsis.

Authors:  Yann-Erick Claessens; Jean-François Dhainaut
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.