Literature DB >> 17189063

Five-year outcome of intraoperative conformal permanent I-125 interstitial implantation for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.

Michael J Zelefsky1, Yoshiya Yamada, Gil'ad N Cohen, Alison Shippy, Heather Chan, David Fridman, Marco Zaider.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the 5-year tumor control and toxicity outcomes for patients with localized prostate treated with I-125 permanent implantation using an intraoperative real-time conformal planning technique. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between January 1998 and June 2002, 367 patients with prostate cancer were treated with I-125 permanent interstitial implantation using a transrectal ultrasound-guided approach. Real-time intraoperative treatment planning which incorporated inverse planning optimization was used. The median follow-up time was 63 months.
RESULTS: The median V100 and D90 were 96% and 173 Gy, respectively. In 96% of cases a D90 of >140 Gy was achieved. The median urethral and rectal doses were 100% and 33% of the prescription doses, respectively. The 5-year PSA relapse-free survival outcomes for favorable and intermediate risk patients according to the ASTRO definition were 96% and 89%, respectively. In these patients no dosimetric parameter was identified which influenced the biochemical outcome. Of 38% who developed acute Grade 2 urinary symptoms, 63% had resolution of their symptoms within a median time of 6 months. The incidence of late rectal and urinary Grade 3 or higher toxicities were 1% and 4%, respectively. Seven percent (n = 27) developed late rectal bleeding (Grade 2) and 19% experienced late Grade 2 urinary symptoms.
CONCLUSION: Real-time intraoperative planning consistently achieved optimal coverage of the prostate with the prescription dose with concomitant low doses delivered to the urethra and rectum. Biochemical control outcomes were excellent at 5 years and late toxicity was unusual. These data demonstrate that real-time planning methods can consistently and reliably deliver the intended dose distribution to achieve an optimal therapeutic ratio between the target and normal tissue structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17189063     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.08.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  23 in total

1.  Toward adaptive stereotactic robotic brachytherapy for prostate cancer: demonstration of an adaptive workflow incorporating inverse planning and an MR stealth robot.

Authors:  J Adam Cunha; I-Chow Hsu; Jean Pouliot; Mack Roach Iii; Katsuto Shinohara; John Kurhanewicz; Galen Reed; Dan Stoianovici
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.442

2.  In vivo visualization of prostate brachytherapy seeds with photoacoustic imaging.

Authors:  Muyinatu A Lediju Bell; Nathanael P Kuo; Danny Y Song; Jin U Kang; Emad M Boctor
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Results from the Quality Research in Radiation Oncology (QRRO) survey: Evaluation of dosimetric outcomes for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Michael J Zelefsky; Gil'ad N Cohen; Walter R Bosch; Lisa Morikawa; Najma Khalid; Cheryl L Crozier; W Robert Lee; Anthony Zietman; Jean Owen; J Frank Wilson; Phillip M Devlin
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 4.  A review of rectal toxicity following permanent low dose-rate prostate brachytherapy and the potential value of biodegradable rectal spacers.

Authors:  M E Schutzer; P F Orio; M C Biagioli; D A Asher; H Lomas; D Moghanaki
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 5.554

5.  Is it necessary to perform week three dosimetric analysis in low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer when day 0 dosimetry is done? A quality assurance assessment.

Authors:  T Shaikh; N G Zaorsky; K Ruth; D Y Chen; R E Greenberg; J Li; K Crawford; E M Horwitz
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Comparison of tumor control and toxicity outcomes of high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy and brachytherapy for patients with favorable risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael J Zelefsky; Yoshiya Yamada; Xin Pei; Margie Hunt; Gilad Cohen; Zhigang Zhang; Marco Zaider
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  A comparison of acute and chronic toxicity for men with low-risk prostate cancer treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy or (125)I permanent implant.

Authors:  Thomas N Eade; Eric M Horwitz; Karen Ruth; Mark K Buyyounouski; David J D'Ambrosio; Steven J Feigenberg; David Y T Chen; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Brachytherapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Georgios Koukourakis; Nikolaos Kelekis; Vassilios Armonis; Vassilios Kouloulias
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2009-09-01

9.  Transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of prostate cancer: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Luigi Mearini; Massimo Porena
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar

Review 10.  [Radiotherapy for prostate cancer].

Authors:  Christian Stanek
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2007
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.