Literature DB >> 17186483

SODOCK: swarm optimization for highly flexible protein-ligand docking.

Hung-Ming Chen1, Bo-Fu Liu, Hui-Ling Huang, Shiow-Fen Hwang, Shinn-Ying Ho.   

Abstract

Protein-ligand docking can be formulated as a parameter optimization problem associated with an accurate scoring function, which aims to identify the translation, orientation, and conformation of a docked ligand with the lowest energy. The parameter optimization problem for highly flexible ligands with many rotatable bonds is more difficult than that for less flexible ligands using genetic algorithm (GA)-based approaches, due to the large numbers of parameters and high correlations among these parameters. This investigation presents a novel optimization algorithm SODOCK based on particle swarm optimization (PSO) for solving flexible protein-ligand docking problems. To improve efficiency and robustness of PSO, an efficient local search strategy is incorporated into SODOCK. The implementation of SODOCK adopts the environment and energy function of AutoDock 3.05. Computer simulation results reveal that SODOCK is superior to the Lamarckian genetic algorithm (LGA) of AutoDock, in terms of convergence performance, robustness, and obtained energy, especially for highly flexible ligands. The results also reveal that PSO is more suitable than the conventional GA in dealing with flexible docking problems with high correlations among parameters. This investigation also compared SODOCK with four state-of-the-art docking methods, namely GOLD 1.2, DOCK 4.0, FlexX 1.8, and LGA of AutoDock 3.05. SODOCK obtained the smallest RMSD in 19 of 37 cases. The average 2.29 A of the 37 RMSD values of SODOCK was better than those of other docking programs, which were all above 3.0 A.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17186483     DOI: 10.1002/jcc.20542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  25 in total

Review 1.  Towards the development of universal, fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods: a long way to go.

Authors:  N Moitessier; P Englebienne; D Lee; J Lawandi; C R Corbeil
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 2.  FINDSITE: a combined evolution/structure-based approach to protein function prediction.

Authors:  Jeffrey Skolnick; Michal Brylinski
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 11.622

3.  Further analysis and comparative study of intermolecular interactions using dimers from the S22 database.

Authors:  Laszlo Fusti Molnar; Xiao He; Bing Wang; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  A comparative study of family-specific protein-ligand complex affinity prediction based on random forest approach.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Yanzhi Guo; Qifan Kuang; Xuemei Pu; Yue Ji; Zhihang Zhang; Menglong Li
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  GalaxyDock BP2 score: a hybrid scoring function for accurate protein-ligand docking.

Authors:  Minkyung Baek; Woong-Hee Shin; Hwan Won Chung; Chaok Seok
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 6.  Software for molecular docking: a review.

Authors:  Nataraj S Pagadala; Khajamohiddin Syed; Jack Tuszynski
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2017-01-16

7.  A comparison of various optimization algorithms of protein-ligand docking programs by fitness accuracy.

Authors:  Liyong Guo; Zhiqiang Yan; Xiliang Zheng; Liang Hu; Yongliang Yang; Jin Wang
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 1.810

8.  Scientific benchmarks for guiding macromolecular energy function improvement.

Authors:  Andrew Leaver-Fay; Matthew J O'Meara; Mike Tyka; Ron Jacak; Yifan Song; Elizabeth H Kellogg; James Thompson; Ian W Davis; Roland A Pache; Sergey Lyskov; Jeffrey J Gray; Tanja Kortemme; Jane S Richardson; James J Havranek; Jack Snoeyink; David Baker; Brian Kuhlman
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.600

9.  SwarmDock and the use of normal modes in protein-protein docking.

Authors:  Iain H Moal; Paul A Bates
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Q-Dock: Low-resolution flexible ligand docking with pocket-specific threading restraints.

Authors:  Michal Brylinski; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 3.376

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.