Literature DB >> 17184625

Self-management of oral anticoagulation therapy improves long-term survival in patients with mechanical heart valve replacement.

Heinrich Koertke1, Armin Zittermann, Otto Wagner, Reiner Koerfer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Early Self-Controlled Anticoagulation Trial has demonstrated that in patients with mechanical heart valve replacement self-management of oral anticoagulation results in less major thromboembolic events than conventional measurement by the general practitioner. However, the effects of self-management on long-term survival are currently not known.
METHODS: Nine hundred thirty patients participated in a follow-up study of the aforementioned trial (488 from the self-management group and 442 from the conventional group). Long-term survival was assessed 12 years after the study began using the intent-to treat analysis as well as the per protocol analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed in order to assess independent predictors of survival.
RESULTS: In total, the 930 patients accrued 8,315 patient-years of observation. During follow-up, 236 patients died. According to the intent-to treat analysis, 10-year survival was 76.1% in the conventional group and 84.5% in the self-management group. The corresponding values for the per protocol analysis were 67.7% and 80.6%, respectively. Age, kind of valve surgery, and study group were independent predictors of survival. Self-management of oral anticoagulation increased long-term survival by 23% (intent-to-treat analysis) and 33% (per protocol analysis), respectively, compared with conventional measurement by the general practitioner. Possible reasons for these advantageous results in the self-management group are fewer thromboembolic events due to a higher percentage of international normalized ratio values lying in the target range compared with the conventional group.
CONCLUSIONS: Data indicate that self-management of oral anticoagulation is a promising strategy in order to increase long-term survival in patients with mechanical prosthetic valves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17184625     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.08.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  14 in total

1.  Is patient self-testing a good thing?

Authors:  Lynn B Oertel; Edward N Libby
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  An evaluation of patient self-testing competency of prothrombin time for managing anticoagulation: pre-randomization results of VA Cooperative Study #481--The Home INR Study (THINRS).

Authors:  Rowena J Dolor; R Lynne Ruybalid; Lauren Uyeda; Robert G Edson; Ciaran Phibbs; Julia E Vertrees; Mei-Chiung Shih; Alan K Jacobson; David B Matchar
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Economic evaluation of the use of point-of-care devices in patients with long term oral anticoagulation.

Authors:  Sophie Gerkens; Jeannine Gailly; Caroline Obyn; Stephan Devriese; Irina Cleemput
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 4.  Anticoagulation for mechanical heart valves in patients with and without atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Usman Baber; Sarina van der Zee; Valentin Fuster
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Long-term self-management of anticoagulation therapy after mechanical heart valve replacement in outside trial conditions.

Authors:  Helmut Mair; Jörg Sachweh; Ralf Sodian; Paolo Brenner; Michael Schmoeckel; Christoph Schmitz; Bruno Reichart; Sabine Daebritz
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-12-07

6.  Two monitoring methods of oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with mechanical heart valve prothesis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhe Xu; Zhiping Wang; Jingsong Ou; Yingqi Xu; Song Yang; Xi Zhang
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 7.  Telemonitoring of left-ventricular assist device patients-current status and future challenges.

Authors:  Nils Reiss; Thomas Schmidt; Michael Boeckelmann; Sebastian Schulte-Eistrup; Jan-Dirk Hoffmann; Christina Feldmann; Jan D Schmitto
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: optimal management of anticoagulation therapy.

Authors:  Daniel M Witt; Robby Nieuwlaat; Nathan P Clark; Jack Ansell; Anne Holbrook; Jane Skov; Nadine Shehab; Juliet Mock; Tarra Myers; Francesco Dentali; Mark A Crowther; Arnav Agarwal; Meha Bhatt; Rasha Khatib; John J Riva; Yuan Zhang; Gordon Guyatt
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-11-27

Review 9.  Anticoagulation for mechanical heart valves: a role for patient based therapy.

Authors:  Robert W Emery; Ann M Emery; Goya V Raikar; Jay G Shake
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 10.  Self-monitoring and self-management of oral anticoagulation.

Authors:  Carl J Heneghan; Josep M Garcia-Alamino; Elizabeth A Spencer; Alison M Ward; Rafael Perera; Clare Bankhead; Pablo Alonso-Coello; David Fitzmaurice; Kamal R Mahtani; Igho J Onakpoya
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.