Literature DB >> 17182247

A tibial-based coordinate system for three-dimensional data.

Clare Fitzpatrick1, David FitzPatrick, Daniel Auger, Jordan Lee.   

Abstract

An accurate and repeatable tibial measurement system will aid in the definition of tibial geometry and improving tibial prosthesis design. Unlike in the femur, there is no standardized method for constructing a tibial coordinate frame. Most tibial measurements are given relative to femoral axes or the coordinate frame of the CT/MRI scanner or radiograph machine. The objective of this study was to establish an independent tibial coordinate frame. Data consisted of CT scans from 34 subjects. The tibial anatomical axis was chosen as the axial axis. The anteroposterior (AP) axis was selected to be parallel to the lateral surface of the tibial shaft and orthogonal to the anatomical axis and from this the mediolateral axis could be derived. The selected AP axis was compared with the surgical tibial AP axis by measuring their variability relative to a common axis, the posterior tibial condylar line (PTCL). The mean angle between the selected AP axis and the perpendicular to the PTCL was measured as -4.07 degrees, standard deviation of 4.28 degrees. The mean angle between the surgical AP axis and the perpendicular to the PTCL was measured as -18.56 degrees, standard deviation of 4.66 degrees. There was no significant difference in the variance of the two sets of measurements (p=0.63). Variability of the selected AP axis was even smaller (standard deviation of 2.74 degrees) when measured independently from the PTCL reference axis, by aligning virtual resection profiles. Anatomically, the selected AP axis was almost perpendicular to the posterior tibial condylar axis. This coordinate system can aid in gathering consistent and repeatable anthropometric data that can be used to improve tibial implant design and could also, in combination with CT/MR imaged-based computer assisted surgery, be used as a guideline for tibial component positioning in TKR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17182247     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2006.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  5 in total

1.  Anatomic single-bundle ACL surgery: consequences of tibial tunnel diameter and drill-guide angle on tibial footprint coverage.

Authors:  H Van der Bracht; L Verhelst; B Stuyts; B Page; J Bellemans; P Verdonk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Two-dimensional planning can result in internal rotation of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shigetoshi Okamoto; Hideki Mizu-uchi; Ken Okazaki; Satoshi Hamai; Yasutaka Tashiro; Hiroyuki Nakahara; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  An application of principal component analysis to the clavicle and clavicle fixation devices.

Authors:  Zubin J Daruwalla; Patrick Courtis; Clare Fitzpatrick; David Fitzpatrick; Hannan Mullett
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  New anatomical reference systems for the bones of the foot and ankle complex: definitions and exploitation on clinical conditions.

Authors:  Michele Conconi; Alessandro Pompili; Nicola Sancisi; Alberto Leardini; Stefano Durante; Claudio Belvedere
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Tibial component rotation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter Z Feczko; Bart G Pijls; Michael J van Steijn; Lodewijk W van Rhijn; Jacobus J Arts; Peter J Emans
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.